Latest questions answered by experts
I’m planning to buy the 2026 Kia Seltos GTX (A) and am confused between the 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol IVT and the 1.5-litre turbo-petrol DCT. The car will be used by two people. On weekdays, it will primarily be used for city commutes, where fuel efficiency, smoothness and reliability are important. On weekends, it will be used for a mix of city driving and occasional highway trips, where good performance and driving pleasure are also desirable. I’ve heard that the IVT is smoother and more stress-free in traffic, while the DCT offers significantly better performance but may face overheating issues in stop-and-go conditions. Which would you recommend for long-term ownership over 7–10 years, considering real-world mileage, reliability, maintenance costs and driving pleasure? Would you choose the IVT for greater peace of mind or the DCT for its turbocharged performance? I’d appreciate advice based on real-world ownership experiences. Thanks in advance!
Go for the Kia Seltos GTX(A) Petrol CVT 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol IVT. For your usage pattern, it is the more sensible and stress-free choice. The IVT is smooth, reliable and well-suited to daily city commutes, where stop-and-go traffic is the norm. It delivers decent fuel efficiency and is generally easier to live with over a long ownership period. The 1.5-litre turbo-petrol DCT is the enthusiast's choice, offering strong performance and a more engaging driving experience on highways. However, DCT gearboxes can get a bit jerky at low speeds and are not as happy in prolonged stop-and-go traffic, where they can heat up and become less smooth. For a 7-10 year ownership horizon, the IVT is the safer bet. It may not be as quick as the turbo, but performance is decent and consistent and dependable in everyday use. If you are looking for a balance between reliability, running costs and some driving pleasure, the IVT is the better fit.

Hello, I regularly follow Autocar podcasts and episodes because I trust your reviews and opinions. I have been driving a Fiat Punto for over a decade, and I find it difficult to connect with Japanese cars, regardless of how feature-rich they are. There is a group of buyers like me who value the European driving experience, especially now that diesel options from the VW Group are no longer available. Do you think the Tata Sierra diesel automatic comes close to offering that European driving feel, and is it worth considering for long-term ownership, particularly given its relatively low sales numbers? Thanks in advance!
The Tata Sierra diesel automatic is worth considering if you are coming from a Fiat Punto and value that European driving feel. The Sierra’s diesel engine and automatic gearbox is well-matched, and the car has a solid, planted feel on the road that is reminiscent of older European cars. It also rides well and feels robust, which is something you will appreciate coming from a Punto. You can also consider the Kia Seltos, the diesel engine is stronger and more refined and the ride is quite planted. It may not be a European product but its built in a manner that does feel closest to one. If you really want to stick with a European car then consider something like a Skoda Kushaq or a Volkswagen Taigun. They are petrol driven but offer the most authentic European driving experience in the segment.
I am 60 years old and am looking to buy a car. Could you please suggest a suitable option for me? Also, would it be worth considering an unregistered demo car from a dealership, and what factors should I check before making a decision?
At 60, your priority should be on ease of use, comfort and a hassle-free ownership experience. The Maruti Suzuki Baleno is a very sensible choice. It is easy to drive, has a comfortable ride, spacious and Maruti's service network is the best in the country. The Maruti Suzuki Dzire is another excellent option if you prefer a sedan, thanks to its comfortable ride and spacious cabin.As for unregistered demo cars, they can be a good deal if the price is significantly lower than a new car. However, you need to be careful. Check the manufacturing year, the number of kilometres driven and the condition of the car. Also, make sure you are getting the full warranty from the date of registration, not from the date the car arrived at the dealership. If the discount is not substantial, it is better to buy a brand new car for complete peace of mind.Overall, go for a new Baleno or Dzire.
Upcoming launch buzz
Community discussions on upcoming launches

BMW
iX facelift

Audi
New Q5

Audi
A6 e-tron

Audi
Q6 e-tron

Audi
e-tron GT facelift

Volkswagen
Virtus facelift

Audi
A5

Vinfast
VF5

Hyundai
Bayon

Mercedes-Benz GLC
Electric
I am planning to buy a petrol automatic subcompact SUV primarily for city driving, with a monthly running of hardly 300km. My main priorities are reliability and rear seat comfort. Which would be a better choice between the Skoda Kylaq and Kia Sonet, considering my requirements?
With just 300 km a month and city use, reliability and rear seat comfort should be your main priorities. The Skoda Kylaq is the better choice here. It uses a proven 1.0 TSI engine paired with a 6-speed torque converter automatic, which is a reliable and smooth combination for city driving. The Kylaq also offers a more comfortable rear seat experience, with better legroom and a more supportive bench, making it a better family car for daily use. The Kia Sonet is a good car, but the Kylaq edges it out on rear seat comfort and overall driving experience. At your running petrol is the right choice and another good option could be the Maruti Suzuki Brezza 1.5 L automatic, which has a comfier rear seat, a smoother drive experience and a better low speed ride.
I am currently driving a 10-year-old Hyundai i20 and am planning to upgrade to an SUV. My annual running is relatively low, at around 8,000 to 10,000 km, with approximately 70% city driving and 30% highway driving. My top priority is safety, followed by fuel efficiency. My budget is around Rs 22 lakh on-road, and I am not considering an EV. Given these requirements, which SUVs would you recommend as the best options?
With your running of 8,000-10,000 km a year and a 70% city usage, petrol is the right choice. Your budget of Rs 22 lakh on-road puts you in the midsize SUV segment, where safety and fuel efficiency can both be prioritised.The Kia Seltos is the most balanced recommendation here. It is one of the safest cars in the segment, with a 5-star Bharat NCAP rating, and the 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine is efficient and well-suited to city driving. The IVT automatic is smooth and reliable, making it easy to live with in traffic. The Seltos also offers a premium cabin and a strong ownership experience.The Hyundai Creta is the alternative. It shares the same engine and gearbox, so the driving experience is very similar but the Seltos feels slightly more premium inside. The choice between the two comes down to personal preference on design and interior feel.If you are willing to stretch your budget slightly, the Maruti Suzuki Victoris Hybrid is worth considering. The hybrid system delivers excellent fuel efficiency, especially in city driving, and the car is well-equipped and comfortable. However, the Seltos and Creta remain the more balanced choices given your priorities.
I recently sold my Ford EcoSport due to spare parts availability issues and am now looking to buy a new car. My priorities are a sub-4-metre car within a budget of Rs 7.5 lakh. We are a family of four adults and one child, and since we are used to the spacious rear seat of the EcoSport, I am looking for a car that offers similar cabin space and comfort. I considered the Tata Punch, but concerns about Tata's after-sales service and service centre experience have made me hesitant. Are there any other cars that would meet my requirements? I'd appreciate recommendations, especially for a spacious family car that offers reliable after-sales support and is suitable for long-term ownership.
Given your budget of Rs 7.5 lakh and the need for a spacious rear seat, the Tata Punch is actually one of the best options in the segment. It offers a surprisingly roomy cabin for its size, a comfortable ride and a robust build, which makes it a very practical family car. Your concern about Tata service is understandable, but it is worth noting that Tata is making improvements in its service network and overall ownership experience. If you are still hesitant about Tata, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza is the alternative we would recommend. It is one of the most spacious sub-4-metre SUVs, with a wide rear bench that comfortably accommodates three passengers. Maruti's service network is the most extensive in the country, and ownership costs are generally low. The only drawback is that the Brezza's starting price is slightly above your stated budget, so you may need to stretch a little.Overall, the Punch remains the best fit for your requirements, but the Brezza is the safer long-term ownership choice.
I am looking for a petrol automatic car under Rs 12 lakh with good features. My first choice is the Honda Amaze, but I am concerned about its ground clearance and engine performance. Around 70% of my driving will be in the city. Would the Amaze be a good choice?
With 70% city driving, the Honda Amaze is actually a very sensible choice. The CVT automatic is smooth and easy to drive in traffic. The engine is reliable, and the car’s compact dimensions make it easy to manoeuvre and park.The only real drawback is that the engine is not particularly torquey, so it can feel a bit flat on highways or when fully loaded. However, for predominantly city use, that is not a major concern. The ground clearance at 172 mm is adequate for most urban conditions, but a fully loaded car can cause the rear suspension to compress significantly, requiring caution over large speed breakers. If you like the Honda Amaze petrol automatic for what it offers, go for it.

I am planning to buy a car this year around Diwali or year-end 2026. I am looking for a spacious, comfortable and a safe 5-seater for my family. My budget is Rs. 8-15 lakh (on-road) under Rs. 12 lakh. Although, I am open to spending less if the car offers excellent mileage, safety, space and reliability. My expected running is 7,000-8,000 km per month primarily for daily commutes mixed with GT roads and city driving. I intend to keep the car for at least 10-12 years, so fuel efficiency, low maintenance, long-term reliability, comfortable seating and good after-sales service are my priorities. I don't need fancy features that I will rarely use; essential safety and convenience features are sufficient. Considering my high monthly running, which fuel type among petrol, diesel or CNG, would be the most economical and practical over 10-12 years? Please recommend the best cars and specific variants within my budget while comparing real-world mileage, running costs, maintenance, reliability and family comfort. For CNG, specifically assess factory-fitted underbody tanks. Which car, engine and fuel option would you suggest for my usage? Suggest for both CNG and petrol.
With 7,000-8,000 km per month, your running is exceptionally high, and that fundamentally changes the recommendation. At this level, fuel efficiency and running costs become the dominant factor, and the car needs to be robust enough for long-term ownership over 10-12 years.Diesel is the most practical and economical choice for your usage. Modern diesel engines are efficient, reliable and well-suited to high-mileage highway driving, and the fuel cost advantage over petrol is significant at your running. CNG is not recommended at this level of usage. Even with factory-fitted underbody tanks, the limited range and refuelling inconvenience make it impractical for such high monthly running. You could end up spending a lot of time waiting in queues at CNG stations.Within your budget, the Tata Altroz is the most value for money diesel car on sale. It is a spacious, comfortable and safe 5-seater with a strong and efficient diesel engine, and good highway manners. There are multiple variants priced below Rs 12 lakh on-road, so you can take your pick, based on the features you need. Expect real-world mileage to be around 16-20kpl.If you want a diesel-automatic option, given your high running, we'd strongly recommend the Kia Sonet HTE O variant (priced at Rs 12 lakh on-road). Its diesel engine is refined, efficient, and the 6-speed torque converter automatic makes the drive experience smooth and effort-free. Real-world efficiency is likely to range between 14-19kpl. The engine-gearbox combination is tried and tested, and you can expect a fuss-free ownership experience with this one.
Hi Autocar Team, I am confused between the Skoda Slavia 1.0 AT and 1.5 DSG. Which would you recommend for long-term ownership? I plan to keep the car for as long as it can reliably handle Bengaluru traffic and highway drives. Please suggest which engine and transmission combination would be more suitable for my needs.
For your usage in Bengaluru traffic with regular highway runs and a long-term ownership plan, the Skoda Slavia 1.0 TSI automatic is the more sensible choice. The 1.0 TSI paired with the 8-speed torque converter automatic is well-suited to handle the stop-start traffic conditions of Bengaluru. The 1.5 TSI is the enthusiast's choice, offering stronger performance and quicker shifts, but the 7-speed dual-clutch gearbox can get a bit jerky in stop-and-go traffic conditions. Also, being more complex, it could be more expensive to repair outside warranty. Out on the open road, though, performance will feel far more effortless and entertaining compared to the 1.0 TSI.In summary, if you are willing to pay a premium for performance and driving enjoyment, the 1.5 TSI DSG is a fantastic engine and gearbox combination, but for your brief, the 1.0 TSI automatic is the smarter long-term choice.
Hi Autocar team, I am considering the Maruti Suzuki Brezza, Mahindra XUV 3XO and Maruti Suzuki Victoris. The 3XO offers more features and space than the Brezza, but I expect it to be less fuel-efficient. The Victoris is considerably more expensive. Is the 3XO a good choice, or should I consider other options?
Yes, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is a very good choice. It is one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment, with a wide cabin that makes it a genuinely comfortable five-seater. It is also feature-rich and offers strong value for money. The only real drawback is the boot, which is one of the smallest in the segment, at least on paper; however, usable space is comparable to rivals.The Maruti Suzuki Brezza is the more sensible choice if you are prioritising reliability, low maintenance costs and Maruti's service network. It is also a comfortable five-seater with a good ride. The Mahindra car, however, feels like the more modern and better-equipped product.
Hi, I am an automotive enthusiast and go for track drive as well. Can you help me out with a suitable car under Rs. 15-17 lakh as I own Ritz diesel that has completed 2.3 lakh km in 10 years without any engine repair or changing timing chain with regular use of full synthetic oil. I do both city and highway driving regularly as my daily run would be 70 km and I do out station travel for work as I stay in Hyderabad and go for trip around Hyderabad to Bengaluru Chennai Pune and Mumbai. I have 3 elders who rarely travel outstation but they sometimes travel within city. My wife and children travel often with me especially for official and personal usage, suggest me a car with good driving dynamics that offers stability abd comfort. Can a 1 liter Skoda vehicle manage driving load or is 1.5 liter better. I don't have an opinion on Kia or Hyundai and I want to know if these brands are reliable and safe. Suggest me a suitable car.
Given your daily usage of 70km, and frequent highway trips, a diesel car will be a more economical choice. And in that price bracket, consider a higher-spec Mahindra XUV 3XO which has an excellent 1.5 Diesel engine that's punchy and refined, and its ride comfort and high speed stability easily matches cars from higher segments.If you insist on a petrol offering that'll appeal to an enthusiast like you, consider a Renault Duster or Nissan Tekton 1.3 Turbo, which are excellent to drive. The only real downside is that their turbo engine isn't efficient. A Slavia or Kushaq are great to drive too, and while their 1.0 TSI feels perfectly fine in the city, on the open road you'll certainly yearn for stronger performance and more effortless power delivery, something which is available with their 1.5 versions; unfortunately, these won't fit into your Rs 15-17 lakh on-road budget.The Hyundai Verna and Creta 1.5 Turbo variants are pricey, while a Kia Seltos with a 1.5 turbo petrol variant in your budget will be with an iMT (clutch-pedal-free manual transmission). It is a well-rounded car, and even though it drives well, it doesn't feel as engaging or as fun-to-drive as a Duster, Tekton or the Skoda offerings. Even the Kia's 1.5 diesel engine lacks outright punch and isn't likely to suit your driving style. Hence we'll suggest you to either consider the Mahindra XUV 3XO diesel, or look at the Renault Duster or Nissan Tekton 1.3 turbo instead.
Hi Autocar Team, I own a Mahindra XUV500 and am considering a Stage 1 ECU remap. What impact would it have on the engine's performance and mileage? Would it affect the engine's lifespan or long-term reliability? I would also like to understand the pros and cons of ECU remapping, including its impact on maintenance costs and overall vehicle reliability. Please advise.
A Stage 1 ECU remap on your XUV500 will give you a noticeable bump in performance, particularly in mid-range torque and overall responsiveness. The car will feel stronger and more eager, especially during overtaking and highway driving. However, this comes with a few important considerations. Fuel efficiency can drop slightly if you drive aggressively to enjoy the extra power, though it can remain similar to stock if you maintain a light foot.An aggressive remap increases stress on the engine, turbo and drivetrain components, which can potentially affect long-term reliability if the car is not maintained well or if the remap is not done properly. The key is to get the remap done by a reputable tuner who understands the XUV500’s engine and keeps the tune within safe limits.
Dear Autocar Team, I currently own a Dzire diesel manual (2018) and now I am planning to buy a new car but I am very confused between Harrier EV Fearless Plus 75kwh and the XEV 9S Pack Two Above 79kwh. Although, I love diesel cars but since I live in Faridabad, my biggest concern is about increasing bans and restrictions on diesel cars. My main usage is on highways and bit within the city. I have clocked 1.3 lakh km on my Dzire in 8-9 years. I am getting the exact Harrier EV model for Rs. 22 lakh (on-road) whereas the XEV 9S will cost around Rs. 27-28 lakh (on-road) and that is my biggest confusion. Should I spend this additional amount on the XEV 9S for Harrier ev because I don't want any hassles as an since I plan to keep the car for the next several years.
Since your choice is between these two exact models, go for the Tata Harrier EV Fearless Plus 75kWh at Rs 22 lakh on-road. It is a much better value proposition given the Rs. 5-6 lakh savings over the Mahindra XEV 9S. The Harrier EV is a solidly-built, hardy SUV that's comfy for 5 adults and their luggage.Sure, the XEV 9S gives you the flexibility of three-rows of seating; a lighter steering with a tighter turning radius; and with a larger battery and a more efficient electric powertrain, real-world range will be better. But since you don't specifically need a three-row SUV, the Harrier EV's lower price makes it the more sensible buy.

Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.








