Jodhpur

•7w

I have a 2017 Hyundai Xcent and want to upgrade to a car with better fuel efficiency. My budget is Rs. 11 lakh. Should I go with the Maruti Suzuki Fronx?

•7w

Yes, the Maruti Suzuki Fronx is a sensible upgrade from your 2017 Xcent, especially if fuel efficiency is a priority. The Fronx is available with two petrol engine options: a 1.2-litre naturally aspirated petrol and a 1.0-litre turbo petrol. The 1.2-litre engine is the better choice for your needs – it is smooth, reliable and delivers good real-world fuel efficiency, making it a strong upgrade over the Xcent. This Maruti Suzuki car also offers a higher seating position, better ground clearance and a more modern feature set, which will make it feel like a meaningful step up from your current car. The 1.0-litre turbo petrol is more performance-oriented and not the best fit if mileage is your main concern. Overall, the Fronx 1.2 petrol is a well-rounded, efficient and easy-to-own upgrade within your budget.

Explore cars mentioned

Maruti Suzuki

Fronx

from ₹7.78 Lakh

More posts on similar cars

•3d

Hi, I am looking to purchase a petrol/AMT car with a budget of Rs 9-12 lakh. My requirements are primarily city usage with monthly long drives, good safety, a spacious rear seat and boot, a smooth ride and strong after-sales service support. Kindly suggest a suitable car.

•2d

With a Rs 9-12 lakh budget, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza VXi AT is worth a close look. It gets a 6-speed automatic and starts at about Rs 10.5 lakh ex-showroom, so it fits comfortably within the budget.For predominantly city use with regular long drives, the torque-converter automatic will generally feel smoother and more relaxed than an AMT, particularly in stop-go traffic and during highway overtaking. It also fits the other requirements reasonably well, with good rear-seat space, a practical boot and Maruti's extensive service network.If you're specifically keen on an AMT, then the Fronx AMT is a sensible alternative and will leave you comfortably within budget. The Maruti Suzuki Fronx also offers a good balance of city usability, highway ability and practicality.

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

•1w

I own a 2015 Maruti Ciaz petrol MT, which I bought as a used car in 2019. As of today, it has clocked over 1,85,000km. Since most of my driving is in the city, parking can sometimes be difficult. I also undertake occasional long drives of around 1,000 - 2,000km round trip. I have not experienced any major issues with the car so far. The clutch assembly has been changed twice in the seven years of my ownership. Should I opt for a new car or continue maintaining and using my current Ciaz?

•3d

The decision to replace should be driven by either escalating maintenance costs or a change in requirements. If the car is still running well and there are no major mechanical issues, it makes financial sense to continue maintaining it. The cost of periodic maintenance and even occasional repairs will almost always be significantly lower than the depreciation hit and upfront cost of a new car.The only caveat is your mention of parking difficulties. If parking is becoming a genuine daily hassle, downsizing to a smaller hatchback like the Hyundai i20 or Maruti Suzuki Fronx compact SUV could be justified. Otherwise, the Ciaz remains a very capable and cost-effective car for both city driving and occasional long highway trips.

Hyundai i20

Maruti Suzuki Fronx

•22h

Hi, my car usage is around 3,000km per month. Currently, I drive a 2020 Ford Endeavour diesel AT 4x4 and a 2017 Mahindra Thar CRDe 4x4 for rough and countryside roads. I enjoy driving both cars on these kinds of roads, although I experience quite a bit of body roll and physical strain. For city driving and highways, I use a 2017 Skoda Rapid diesel MT and an Innova Crysta diesel. I particularly enjoy driving the Skoda, while I prefer travelling as a passenger in the Crysta because of its comfort. As you can see, I have been a diesel car owner so far, but with diesel cars becoming less common in the market, should I consider switching to a petrol engine or a hybrid? My usage covers almost every type of Indian road, including metro cities, countryside roads, highways and hilly terrain, so I am finding it difficult to decide which car would suit my requirements best within a budget of Rs 40 lakh, with an automatic transmission. My top priorities are safety, with zero compromise, followed by driving comfort and the highest possible mileage.

•2h

You already have different cars for different purposes, but you haven't mentioned which of the four cars you would like to replace. Within Rs 40 lakhs, the Toyota Innova Hycross hybrid is an excellent, tried and tested option. It is efficient, extremely spacious, and the ride comfort is good too. Also, with light steering, a responsive powertrain and good visibility and driving aids, it is very user-friendly. So unlike the Innova Crysta, which would be more suited for the chauffeur-driven, the Hycross is also surprisingly easy to drive too.You could also consider the new Kia Sorento, which seems excellent value for money. We haven't got a chance to drive or test it yet, however it seems spacious, well-equipped and on first impression, the interior quality seems to be excellent. This is one SUV you must test drive before finalising - it has both 2.2 diesel and 1.6 turbo strong hybrid options.

Toyota Innova HyCross

Toyota Innova Crysta

Kia Sorento

View all Posts

Cars you may like

Maruti Suzuki Baleno

₹5.99 - ₹9.99 Lakhs

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

₹7.40 - ₹13.55 Lakhs

Mahindra Scorpio N

₹13.69 - ₹25.49 Lakhs

Hyundai Exter

₹5.81 - ₹9.46 Lakhs

Tata Tiago

₹4.77 - ₹8.62 Lakhs

View all

Popular discussions right now

•2d

I am planning to buy a naturally aspirated petrol automatic car and have shortlisted the Toyota Hyryder mild hybrid and Honda Elevate. Which one would be the better choice?

•2d

Go for the Honda Elevate CVT. Both the Elevate and the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder mild hybrid use naturally aspirated petrol engines, but the Elevate’s 1.5-litre engine is more refined, and the CVT gearbox is silky smooth, making it a more relaxed car to drive in everyday conditions. The Elevate also benefits from Honda’s strong reputation for long-term reliability and low maintenance costs, which is exactly what you want from a naturally aspirated petrol automatic. The Hyryder is still a good car, but the Elevate is the more complete package for this brief.

Honda Elevate

Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder

•4d

Which car should I buy among Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara Petrol base or Kia Seltos petrol base? And also tell me if anyone has faced power issue or pickup issue while overtaking as I want the car for long term.

•4d

Between the two, the Seltos is the better choice, especially if you are looking at the base variant. It feels more premium, is the newer product and offers a more complete package even in its lower variants.The 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol makes 115hp and 144Nm. It isn't a particularly powerful engine, but it is smooth and refined and is perfectly adequate for normal city driving.For overtaking, it won't have the punch of the Seltos turbo, but it isn't underpowered either. With a full load and during quick highway overtakes, you may need to plan ahead and use higher revs. The Grand Vitara's 1.5 petrol is also a smooth, simple powertrain, but its performance is more relaxed and the base variant is quite sparsely equipped.

Kia Seltos

Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara

•5d

I am new to driving and am looking for a sub-4-metre petrol SUV with a torque converter automatic gearbox. My budget is around Rs 12-13 lakh on-road. I have shortlisted two options: the Skoda Kylaq Signature automatic and the Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic. We are a family of five. My current usage is mostly within the city, but based on my future work requirements, it could shift to an 80:20 mix of city and highway driving.

•3d

Go for the Skoda Kylaq Signature AT. For a new driver with predominantly city use, its 1.0 TSI with a 6-speed torque-converter automatic is smooth and easy to drive, while the compact dimensions make it relatively easy to manage in traffic. It also has a more mature, planted feel on the highway.The Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro AT is the better choice if rear-seat space is the priority. Its cabin is wider and more accommodating for a family of five, and its 1.2 turbo-petrol makes 200Nm, giving it stronger low-end and mid-range performance than the Kylaq.However, the 3XO's boot is also one of its compromises, while the Kylaq offers a better balance of driving dynamics, boot space and highway manners. With your usage potentially becoming 80:20 city/highway, the Kylaq's combination works particularly well.

Skoda Kylaq

Mahindra XUV 3XO

View all Posts