Autocar India
KC

kalyan chakravarthy

3d

Which is better between the KTM 390 and the Himalayan 450? Or is it better to wait for Norton?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

The Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 is one of the most sorted single-cylinder adventure bikes on sale, and aside from its portly kerb weight and large size, there are few drawbacks with this machine. It has excellent seating and ride comfort, a grunty engine, a plethora of official accessories, and RE's service network is one of the widest in the country. If you can make your peace with its size, the Himalayan is a hard machine to fault realistically, for most use cases.Today, KTM India will sell you a 390 Adventure with both 349cc and 399cc engines, and the price difference between the most affordable and most expensive model is over Rs 1 lakh. The 350cc 390 Adventure is a capable long-distance machine, and you won't miss the drop in outright peak power too much, especially if this is your first 300cc+ machine. The 399cc models are, of course, packing in better performance, and the higher variants even come with more adjustable and longer travel suspension. Owing to its lighter weight, the KTM is more lively than the RE in the twisties and is also easier to manage at slower speeds inside the city. Do bear in mind that no matter which version of the 390 Adventure you choose, you'll have to make your peace with some amount of vibration because these aren't the most refined bikes in today's market. Coming to the Norton Atlas adventure models, with their 585cc, twin-cylinder motors. These bikes are sure to be in a different segment when compared to the single-cylinder 350-400cc machines listed above. No realistic comparison between them would be a fair or straightforward one, and it's better to cross-shop the Atlas with the Honda NX500, Kawasaki Versys 650 and BMW F 450 GS - if at all. We're yet to ride and evaluate the Norton Atlas models, and even if they launch this year, it would be a wise move to wait at least 6 months - if not more - before investing in a brand-new platform from a new brand which has yet to establish a comprehensive presence in the Indian market.

Royal Enfield Himalayan
KTM 390 Adventure
Honda Bikes NX500
Kawasaki Versys 650
BMW Bikes F 450 GS
NK

Navneet Kumar

3d

I am looking for a bike with good performance and safety features. It will be used for short daily commutes and occasional long rides. My budget is around Rs 3 lakh. I am confused between the Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 and the Triumph Speed 400. Triumph's service network is quite limited, and the bike has also been detuned. On the other hand, the Guerrilla is more expensive and still lacks traction control. Kindly advise which one I should choose.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1h

The 350cc Triumph Speed 400 may not have the outright performance it once used to have, and is certainly slower than the Guerrilla 450 now, but even so, it remains a comfortable machine with sprightly performance and its refinement should also see a small improvement. However, if you don't have a Triumph dealer near you, opting for one wouldn't be the wisest thing to do.Yes, the Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 is more expensive than the Speed 400 and doesn't have traction control, but unless you are a very inexperienced rider or ride through bad patches of road extensively, you are realistically unlikely to miss this feature. The Guerrilla is definitely the more engaging and sportier machine of the two, and for the small price increment it commands over the Speed, the added oomph is well worth it.Take test rides of both to see which one suits you better and then make your decision. If you don't have a Triumph service centre near you, ask the dealership if someone will visit your residence/office to service the bike and make sure to opt for the roadside assistance.

Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
Triumph Speed 400
MD

Max D

4d

I am planning to buy a sedan, despite most people today preferring SUVs. I am considering the Hyundai Verna HX10 IVT and the Volkswagen Virtus 1.5 DSG. Since I would be spending around Rs 20 lakh on either of these cars, I wanted to know whether sedans still make sense given Indian road conditions. Are roads improving enough to justify buying a sedan again, or should one still stick to SUVs? I also noticed that a similarly equipped SUV as the Creta costs around Rs 3-4 lakh more. Is this premium justified, or is it better to save the money and buy a sedan instead?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
4h

Sedans absolutely make sense. Road quality in most cities has improved enough that a modern sedan’s clearance handles regular bumps and broken patches fine. You'd buy an SUV mainly for the road presence and higher seating position, and these days, very few offer AWD or specialised off-road hardware. If your daily commute has absolutely broken roads, steep speed breakers or is prone to flooding, that extra 10-20mm of ground clearance will help. Or if you have elderly passengers for whom getting into and out of a sedan is difficult. If not, you are paying Rs 3-4 lakh more for the feel-good factor rather than any tangible benefit.Pick the Hyundai Verna IVT. For your mostly urban Indian driving and on a Rs 20 lakh budget, it is smoother to drive, easier to live with, and cheaper to run. The automatic is smooth in traffic, the ride is comfortable, and there is no long-term worry around heat-and-traffic wear that the Volkswagen Virtus 1.5 with its quick but complex gearbox can throw up. The Virtus is the driver’s car here - stronger on highways and more fun in corners - but it can stretch past your budget on-road, and repairs aren’t cheap if things go wrong.

VehicleHyundai Verna
VehicleVolkswagen Virtus