MV Agusta F3 800 review, test ride

    Can MV Agusta’s mid-capacity supersport impress where its larger sibling failed to?

    Published on Jan 27, 2017 11:45:00 AM

    33,844 Views

    Make : MV Agusta
    Model : F3 800

    Until recently, I would’ve given an arm and a leg to ride the MV Agusta F4 – the most beautiful superbike in the world, in my opinion. Just a few months ago, I got to ride it, that too at the Madras race track. Sounds like a dream come true, right? Well, I actually came away rather disappointed. Its riding position is too tall, even for my 5-foot-10-inch frame. The overall ergonomics are excessively aggressive and, worst of all, in today’s day and age of cutting-edge litre bikes, the F4 feels positively primitive. They say you should never meet your heroes. So, I have all of this running through my mind just before I get on its smaller sibling, the F3 800. It’s quite similar to the F4 when it comes to looks, so the riding experience should be similar too, right?

    A WORLD APART 

    Wrong! The moment I straddle the F3, I know that this is an entirely different beast. Smaller, narrower and more importantly, shorter. I’m immediately comfortable with its 805mm saddle height and the bars feel closer and slightly taller as well. Make no mistake, it has a committed supersport posture, but I get a feeling that this is something I could get used to. Thumbing the starter, however, brings back some of the earlier doubts. At idle revs, it almost sounds like something in the engine is broken, with a strange rattle emanating from under the bike. But the moment it gets going, I breathe a sigh of relief as that rattling gives way to a muffled rasp that hints at a sonorous symphony from the three tiny slash-cut exhaust pipes.

    ITALIAN STALLION

    The source of all that aural amusement is a three-cylinder motor that’s been derived from MV’s 675cc mill from the baby F3. With the same bore, but a longer stroke, its cubic capacity has gone up to 798cc, ensuring that this new motor packs a lot more torque – there’s a full 88Nm coming in at 10,600rpm. Even with a lower redline than the 675, this motor manages a healthy 148hp of peak power. But these numbers mean nothing when you’re pootling about in the city. In the urban environment, what’s most impressive is the throttle response. Even though the slightly ancient- looking digital instrument cluster proudly shows the engine map set to ‘Sport’, the throttle response is extremely linear and predictable. It’s amazing how many sportbikes these days get this wrong, even with all their fancy electronic skullduggery. The F3 is a shining example of ride-by-wire throttle done right.

    Exhaust note is mental past 7000rpm.

    Highway riding is a whole different story, though. As the digital rev counter rapidly climbs beyond 7,000rpm, the exhaust note goes into an absolute frenzy. The rasp turns into a roar and the F3 shoots ahead ferociously, with the front end skipping as it tries to claw its way into the air, but is kept firmly in check by the MVICS traction control. This system offers four riding modes (Rain, Normal, Sport and Custom), as well as eight-step switchable traction control. With TC on 8, the F3 feels like a vicious dog with a large muzzle, so the next step is to turn that down to a more reasonable, and probably more fun, 4. However, navigating the archaic menus using the barely usable buttons on the handlebars is another thing all together. But once the ride mode is set, the beautifully set-up throttle allows for precise control as the bike pops small, manageable power wheelies when you give it the beans.

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Search By Bike Price
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.20%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.13%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.82%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.85%

    Total Votes : 1472
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe