Two key decisions that will define the Thar’s future

    The heritage design and avoiding the small-car tax benefit are two key decisions that Sergius Barretto thinks will shape the future of the Thar.

    Published on Aug 23, 2020 07:05:00 PM

    46,639 Views

    Two key decisions that will define the Thar’s future

    It’s finally here, the Mahindra Thar – arguably one of the most iconic of Indian products – has at last received a much-needed update. This new-generation Thar doesn’t just pick up where the old one left off, it takes a massive leap forward.

    At the unveiling, Dr Pawan Goenka, president, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., said that, due to the iconic status of the Thar, there were “decision after decisions” that the company had to make during the development. The decision to have the new Thar look absolutely purposeful and retain its unparalleled off-road ability was a given, and looking at the vehicle, its specifications and features, it’s safe to say Mahindra has nailed it.

    But to me there are two key decisions made by the company that will define success for the new Thar – one I like, one I don’t. Let’s begin with the latter.

    Design Heritage

    Given their shared heritage, it’s inevitable that the new Thar would resemble the Jeep Wrangler, and as Goenka said, “a Thar has to look like a Thar,” but I think the company has clung too hard to the heritage design cues.

    Yes, finding a balance between a unique design and being in touch with your roots is tricky business, but Goenka did say the company had seven design iterations, ranging from a just a “design evolution” to a “totally new” design. Going by the final product, I think the company has stayed too far away from the “totally new” end of the spectrum.

    Though this is hardly going to be an issue in India, it will be an important element for Mahindra in times to come. The company is rapidly making huge strides in its product development and export footprint and, in the mid-term future, it’s not hard to imagine Mahindra products standing shoulder to shoulder with Jeep and others in many global markets.

    This is when a unique identity would be a much-valued asset. Remember, Mahindra’s ‘heritage’ is basically concentrated in India, while in global markets a unique identity and persona would certainly help the company’s image. You wouldn’t want to enter a market and get ‘grilled’ about being a ‘me-too’ product, would you? Even in India, competing in the same segment as Jeep will require a unique design language and identity.

    Sure, there’s time to work on this, but as the company said, this is an absolute icon of a vehicle, and so if there ever was a product that Mahindra could have birthed its own design signature with, this was it. The Thar would easily build and solidifying the brand identity,which would then rub off on its stablemates.

    Small-car benefit

    At 3,985mm in length, the new Thar comes under the sub-four-metre mark, and if Mahindra had gone with smaller petrol and diesel engines, it could have easily qualified for the small-car tax breaks. But going with bigger engines is a decision that I absolutely love.

    There’s already chatter online about using smaller engines and going for an attractive low price. This has merit and could perhaps work later on, but for now, it’s imperative that the Thar has a powerful, large-capacity engine. As Goenka said, “Thar is all about power” and beyond the performance, it’s the imagery that’s key. You can talk of turbochargers and direct injection, but small capacity is still viewed by many as inferior, and so I believe launching with two large-capacity powerplants was the right thing to do.

    Mahindra is also being criticised for not launching a 4x2 version, but here too I’m glad the company has stuck with only 4x4s. The Thar is already an ‘affordable’ product and it’s much like the Victorinox Swiss army knife, where even those who buy it as a stylish accessory need to know that the blade and its other tools are all very capable.

    Having smaller-capacity engines, 4x2 drivetrains and a lower price would bring in an initial flood of customers, but this would fizzle out and would require deft balancing of the profit margin too. It’s something an executive would do to get a quick promotion, but not what someone playing the long game would do.

    And credit here goes to Mahindra’s team of long-serving stalwarts, who have wisely not fallen for the ‘quick and large volumes but small margin’ trap. Rather than trying to get more people to pull out their wallets, Mahindra has worked towards appealing to those who will open them wider. This will only build the brand, increase desirability for potential customers, and profitability for its makers.

    Also see:

    2020 Mahindra Thar review, test drive

    New Mahindra Thar AX and LX variants explained

    2020 Mahindra Thar first look video

    2020 Mahindra Thar image gallery

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.57%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.43%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.09%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.91%

    Total Votes : 1076
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe