Delhi

Every helpful action can earn a badge.

Posted in

Comparisons

•48w

Planning to buy Scorpio. Which one is better, S11 Classic or Scorpio N? Generally, I drive on highways, and in the city, I either use a cab or my Ford Figo 5-seater. Now planning to have a 7-seater.

261

•48w

The Mahindra Scorpio N is a much better product overall. It has a more powerful and refined engine, a stable ride that is essential for highway driving, and a good set of safety and comfort features. The Mahindra Scorpio N price starts at Rs. 13.69 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi).

The third row is also better than the jump-seat layout of the Scorpio Classic.

Scorpio N

Get Best Offers

Scorpio Classic

Get Best Offers

More posts on similar cars

•3d

Please advise which car would be the best choice for long-term ownership: the Mahindra Scorpio, Tata Safari, Tata Harrier, Jeep Compass, Volkswagen SUV, or any other suitable option. My priority is reliability, long-term durability, and hassle-free ownership over the next 10 years or more. I would appreciate suggestions based on real-world ownership experience, maintenance costs, spare parts availability, and after-sales support.

1.1k

•3d

For long-term ownership, the Mahindra Scorpio N is the safest recommendation from your shortlist. It has a proven track record, robust mechanicals and a strong service network, making it a dependable choice for 5-10 years of ownership. The Tata Harrier and Tata Safari have improved significantly, but the Scorpio N still has the edge on long-term reliability and ownership confidence. The Jeep Compass is a good product, but it is now an ageing model and does not offer the same value proposition as the Scorpio N. If you are open to alternatives, the Mahindra XUV 7XO is worth considering. It is a more modern product with a better balance of comfort, features and refinement, and it is a strong long-term ownership proposition as well. The Volkswagen Taigun and Skoda Kushaq are excellent driver's cars, but they are smaller and do not offer the same level of space or road presence as the Scorpio N or XUV 7XO.

•4d

Hi, I am looking for a budget-friendly car for driving in the hills of Uttarakhand. My priorities are reliability, high ground clearance and the ability to handle hilly roads with ease. I am considering the Mahindra Bolero Classic. Would it be a suitable choice for my requirements? Thanks in advance.

450

•3d

The Mahindra Bolero Classic is a sensible choice for Uttarakhand hills. It is a rugged, proven workhorse with high ground clearance, a simple mechanical package and a reputation for reliability on rough terrain. If your usage is predominantly in the hills, with bad roads and steep inclines, the Bolero Classic will serve you well.However, it is worth considering the Mahindra Scorpio Classic as well. It offers a more powerful engine and a more modern cabin while retaining the same rugged, body-on-frame construction and high ground clearance. The Mahindra Scorpio Classic is better suited for long drives and highway runs, while still being capable in the hills.If your budget is tight and your usage is mostly short hill runs, the Bolero Classic is the right choice. If you can stretch your budget a bit, the Scorpio Classic is the more comfortable and versatile option for long-term ownership.

•2d

I have a budget of around Rs 14-15 lakh and am considering the Kia Syros EV with a 42kWh battery and the Tata Nexon EV Creative with a 45kWh battery. Which is the better choice? I am particularly concerned about the NMC battery chemistry in the Syros EV.

141

•1d

The Kia Syros EV 42kWh is the one to go for. It's significantly more spacious than the Tata Nexon EV, and overall quality and reliability are a clear step above the Nexon's. In our experience, Hyundai and Kia's electric cars are also the most efficient, so you'll manage a crucial bit more range on the Syros too. The NMC battery pack should not be a deal breaker by any means. While LFP is theoretically better suited to hotter climates as we have in India, real-world performance does not suggest one chemistry is better than the other. Car makers develop vehicles with a full life cycle in mind, and the long warranties on EV batteries should allay any fears you may have.

View all Posts

Has E20 fuel affected your mileage?

Expert reviews worth reading

MahindraScorpio N

Read expert review

MahindraScorpio Classic

Read expert review

Is ADAS worth paying extra for in a car?

Popular discussions right now

•6d

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy a seven-seater car. I have test-driven the Renault Triber Turbo and Citroen Aircross X and was impressed by what both offer at their price points. However, the Aircross put a wide smile on my face. As a current Maruti Suzuki user, I did not consider the Ertiga because it feels similar to our Swift. I liked the Aircross X but am sceptical about Citroen's service network and spare parts availability. However, there are three Citroen showrooms within 45 km of my place. Please suggest which car I should choose. My budget: Rs. 15 lakh Current vehicle: Second-generation Maruti Suzuki Swift petrol (2017) Annual usage: Around 10,000 km, with a 50:30:20 split between town, highway and city driving Requirement: A seven-seater car

624

•6d

The Citroen's interiors feel more special, its engine is more powerful, and its ride-handling balance is outstanding; however, for seven adults, it won't be as comfortable as the Triber.In fact, the Triber's superb packaging makes it genuinely comfortable for passengers in all three rows, despite its compact sub-4-meter dimensions. The new turbo-petrol engine makes it an effortless performer, and its ride quality feels very mature too. Moreover, the Triber Turbo is also much more affordable in comparison, making it outstanding value for money. Yes, the Aircross X will appeal to your heart, but given Citroen's limited service network and cramped third row, the Triber Turbo is the more sensible choice.

•3d

I am planning to buy my first car. I want to have a 7-seater and need it for long term ownership. I liked the Citroen Aircross X design for 5+2. I am planning to choose a car with automatic transmission. I have couple of major concerns for which I would like your advice. First one is Mileage, I heard Aircross has a mileage issue and its real-world city mileage is 8 kpl while on highway it is 14 kpl. Is it the same for X version also? Second advice is for its service network. I have heard from the people that its service is slow. Regular servicing also takes around 2 days of time. I have a service center within 10 km from my home. My budget is Rs. 20 Lakh and I need an automatic transmission with rear and front parking camera or 360-degree camera since I am a new driver. Are there any 7-seater alternatives within this budget?

281

•2d

The Citroen Aircross X is a good-looking car, now with a premium interior. It is the only SUV in its category which offers a 5+2 seating configuration, and even though the third row is not particularly spacious, it works for occasional use. The real-world fuel efficiency figures as per our tests are 9.5kpl and 13.62kpl in city and highway conditions, respectively, which is quite decent given the strong and smooth performance this 1.2-turbo-petrol-AT delivers. What's more is that ride comfort is outstanding, perhaps the best among all midsize SUVs. So as far as comfort and practicality goes, the Aircross X is a good car.Citroen's service centre network is limited, but since you have a touchpoint close to your home, your vehicle's regular servicing and maintenance is likely to be taken care of smoothly. If you love the Aircross X for what it is, go for it - as far as value goes, it is an outstanding proposition. If you're looking for proper seven-seater alternatives, we'd strongly recommend the Kia Carens Clavis HTK+ turbo-petrol automatic version. All three rows are properly spacious, well-suited for adults. This variant will be within your Rs 20 lakh on-road budget, and it has front and rear parking sensors, as well as rear-view camera to make parking easy for you. Sure, it isn't an SUV, but it is a very sensible car, if you need a proper seven-seater.

•4d

Hi team, I am planning to buy the Tata Altroz diesel, but I am confused between the Altroz and the Kia Sonet. Given that both options fall into different segments, I am unsure whether I should go for the Altroz or consider a sub-4-metre SUV like the Sonet. Could you please help me understand which would be the better choice? Thanks in advance.

459

•4d

Go for the Tata Altroz diesel. Your daily running of 30km and a mix of city and highway driving make diesel a sensible choice, and the Altroz is a genuinely strong package. The diesel engine is efficient, punchy and well suited to both city commutes and highway runs, while the Altroz itself is spacious, comfortable and has a proven safety record. It is also significantly more affordable than the Sonet, allowing you to opt for a higher variant with more features within the same budget.The Altroz diesel offers a better balance of efficiency, performance and ownership cost. The only caveat is that the Altroz diesel is available only with a manual gearbox, so if you specifically want an automatic, the Kia Sonet diesel automatic would be the better choice. Otherwise, the Altroz diesel is the smarter buy.

View all Posts