I'm considering investing in the top-end 1.0L Skoda Kushaq. Should I wait for the upcoming facelifted version, or is the current model still a solid choice? I drive approximately 30 kilometers daily. Additionally, should I consider upgrading to the 1.5L engine instead of the 1.0L?

Autocar India

•2h

With a budget of ₹15 lakh, consider the Skoda Kushaq Classic+ 1.0-litre turbo-petrol mated to the new 8-speed automatic transmission. With this Skoda car, you'll get a similar solid and secure feel, as well as confident driving manners, similar to your outgoing Vento. The turbo-petrol is peppy, and the smooth 8-speed torque converter complements it nicely. Also, compared to the sub-4-meter cars you'll otherwise get at this price, the Kushaq Classic+ will give you more cabin and boot space, which as a Vento owner, you might appreciate. With heavier localisation, Skoda's maintenance costs have reduced over time, so ownership cost is likely to be lower.If you're keen on getting a sub-4-meter compact SUV, consider the Skoda Kylaq and Hyundai Venue, both of which are enjoyable to drive (although the Kylaq has an edge), and should be easy on your pocket too.

Skoda Kushaq

Skoda Kylaq

Hyundai Venue

Autocar India

•1d

If you mostly drive yourself and do not regularly carry a large family, the Skoda Kylaq is the better fit for your budget and usage. It is more compact than the Kushaq, making it easier to manoeuvre in traffic and park in the city. At the same time, it still feels like a proper Skoda on the highway, with its strong 1.0 TSI engine, solid build, and well-sorted dynamics.Under ₹15 lakh on-road, you are likely to get a better‑equipped Kylaq variant than an equivalent Kushaq, because the Kylaq sits in a segment below and is priced lower. That means more features and a nicer trim level for the same money, which matters if this will be your primary car.The Kushaq only really makes sense if you genuinely need the extra cabin width and rear legroom on a daily basis, or want the added highway comfort of the larger SUV. It is longer and has a bit more space overall, so it is better suited if you often travel with rear passengers and a lot of luggage.Given your mostly city‑plus‑weekend usage and 15 lakh cap, we would lean towards the Kylaq. It offers the driving feel of Skoda car in a tidier, more affordable package without compromising on highway ability.

Skoda Kushaq

Skoda Kylaq

Autocar India

•3h

With 60% city use and 40% highway trips in mind, I’d move your booking up to the Kia Seltos HTK(O). It suits your mix better because it adds the everyday things that cut stress on long drives and make city life easier, without going overboard on price.Compared to the HTE, the HTK(O) brings in useful bits, such as auto-folding mirrors, a rear wiper and defogger, smart key with push-button start, and front parking sensors. It also has niceties like a panoramic sunroof and leatherette seats with ventilation (only on the automatic). The HTK(O) will generally feel more premium inside and out, with better trim and alloy wheels, which can also help at resale.If you want to keep the spending tighter, the HTK is the sensible minimum upgrade, but since that is not an issue, the HTK(O) is the sweet spot. Overall, for your use and outlook, that’s the wise spend.

Kia Seltos