Autocar India
SU

Sushant

14w

Hey there, I am confused between the Hero Extreme 160R 4V (with cruise control) and the Yamaha XSR 155. I’m a college student and want a bike for daily commuting, with enough power for hill rides, affordable service costs, and good fuel economy. Right now I’m leaning more toward the Extreme 160R 4V but I’m still unsure. Can you help clarify which one I should choose?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
13w

The Hero Xtreme 160R 4V is a sporty commuter which has a feature no other competitor in the segment does - cruise control. It has a reasonably peppy and smooth engine, good suspension and is quite a comfortable machine overall, even for taller people. It will also return good fuel economy, and Hero machines are generally known to be affordable to own and maintain. It is also quite a bit more affordable than the XSR155, so if your budget is tight, then it makes for a good option to consider.

Coming to the Yamaha XSR155, this is a far more modern machine in terms of its engine architecture and its chassis design, using proven fundamentals from the R15 in a neo-retro package. The XSR is sure to be the quicker, better-handling machine while also returning comparable fuel economy to the Xtreme. Yamaha's aren't known to be expensive to live with either, but since the XSR has a more complex powertrain, its running costs could be a little higher than the simpler Hero. 

Both are different machines from distinct segments, so we would urge you to go get a test ride of them so you can make an informed decision. 

 

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V

More questions on similar bikes

DE

Deepak

2d

I am a first-time bike buyer looking for a retro-style motorcycle for my daily commute of around 30–35 km in Mumbai. I have considered the Yamaha XSR155 and Yamaha FZ-X Hybrid — are there any other options you would recommend? I am looking for a bike that is easy to maintain and service. I am 5'8" tall, so please suggest accordingly. I also have a small child, so comfort and practicality are important factors for me.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

While both the Yamaha options you have shortlisted have their own strong points, neither would be the best fit for your usage, in our opinion. Considering you have a pretty lengthy daily commute in Mumbai (where the road surface by and large ranges from subpar to non-existent), we would recommend you pick a comfortable machine like the TVS Ronin or Royal Enfield Hunter 350. Both have neutral ergonomics, neo-retro styling and plush suspension, which should make them well-suited for your use case. One area where both the smaller Yamaha machines will edge out the Ronin and Hunter is fuel efficiency, but aside from that, the TVS & Royal Enfield make for a better purchase. The Yamaha XSR155 is a lovely sporty neo-retro machine, but its suspension is too stiff over bad roads. The Yamaha FZ-X is a 149cc commuter, and its performance, handling, and overall feel won't be as premium as the other bikes mentioned here. Take a test ride of both the Ronin and Hunter to see which one suits you best. We also have multiple comparison reviews of the Hunter, XSR and Ronin on our channel as well as website, and we'd encourage you to take a look at them before you make your purchase.

TVS Ronin
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Yamaha XSR155
Yamaha FZ-X
NB

Nikhil Bagdekar

11h

I am looking for a sports tourer similar to the Honda CB250R or Honda CB300F. However, both bikes have been discontinued, so I am exploring suitable alternatives. I am not a fan of neo-retro styling and would prefer a modern-looking motorcycle. I also need a bike with good riding ergonomics and dynamics suitable for long rides. My daily commute is around 60 km. Could you please suggest the best alternatives available? Also, would it be worth waiting for new launches that might offer a fresh design and better options in this segment?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
8h

Since you have a rather long daily commute and don't want to go for a neo-retro machine, an adventure bike makes good sense. Your previously shortlisted - but no longer available - options indicate that you were looking to get something in the 250-300cc space. In that vein, we'd recommend you look at the TVS Apache RTX 300. The RTX is a comfortable, quick and feature-laden machine which will also return decent fuel economy if ridden sensibly. In a similiar vein, you should also look at the KTM 250 Adventure and the base 390 Adventure (350cc) models, depending on your usage and budget. A test ride of these options will help you narrow down which bike is best for you.

KTM 250 Adventure
KTM 390 Adventure
TVS Apache RTX
VD

Vishal Dewangan

4d

Could you please help me decide between the KTM 390 Adventure and the Triumph Scrambler 400X? I am 5'8" and plan to use the bike for daily city commuting, weekend long rides, and occasional touring, so I need a machine that balances low-end tractability for traffic with high-speed stability for the highway. Given my height, I am particularly concerned about the ergonomics and seat height of both bikes; which one would be more manageable in stop-and-go situations while still providing the comfort and luggage-carrying capacity needed for long-distance trips?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Both bikes have individual strengths and weaknesses, so you'll have to choose your bike depending on what you can live with and without. The (now 350cc) Triumph Scrambler 400 X can be an all-rounder if you want, but it excels in city situations. On the highway, once you cross the triple-digit threshold, you can feel the engine starting to cross its comfort zone and start to feel a little strained with vibrations creeping in progressively. The KTM 390 Adventure (398cc version) remains a proven bet to stick with as a do-it-all machine, although inside the city at slower speeds and lower revs, the engine can feel a little gutless below 4,000rpm. However, on the highway it will deliver the same performance we've come to know and expect from KTM 390s and remains a good option for weekend rides and touring.When it comes to seat height and ergonomics, this KTM bike again has the upper hand because it is a little easier to get your feet down than on the Triumph bike. Do keep in mind that physically, the Adventure is a larger machine than the Scrambler and inside the city filtering through tight gaps, you'll feel that size. We haven't yet ridden the 350cc KTM 390 Adventure and we'd advise you to get a test ride of both bikes to get a clearer idea before you make a decision.

KTM 390 Adventure
Triumph Scrambler 400 X

Popular discussions right now

Posted on: 23 Jan 2026