I’d like you to let me know about Lexus es 350h

autocar.india

•56m

The 2021 Range Rover Evoque SE R-Dynamic 2.0L Ingenium petrol is a BS6-compliant engine, but it is not officially certified for E20 fuel. The “Premium Gasoline Recommended, 91” label refers to octane rating, not ethanol content. In India, regular petrol is now 95 octane, so you do not need to use premium fuel unless the manufacturer specifically requires it. The bigger question is ethanol compatibility. BS6 engines were designed with some ethanol tolerance, but E20 certification only became mandatory for new models from April 2023 onwards. Land Rover has not issued a blanket statement confirming E20 compatibility for older BS6 models.Should you buy it? At Rs 40 lakh, a lightly used Evoque is a tempting entry into the premium SUV segment. The Evoque offers a genuinely premium cabin, strong performance and a distinctive design. However, ownership costs are high. Land Rover parts and service are expensive, and long-term reliability is not as bulletproof as some German rivals. If you are buying this as a weekend car or a second car, it makes sense. If this is your only car and you plan to keep it for 5-10 years, you need to be comfortable with higher maintenance costs.On E20, the reality is that most modern BS6 engines will run on E20 without immediate issues, but long-term durability is unproven. Ethanol can accelerate wear on certain rubber and plastic fuel system components over time.Overall, buy the Evoque if you want a premium SUV experience and are comfortable with higher running costs. If you want a lower-risk, long-term ownership experience, a new Kia Seltos, Hyundai Creta or Skoda Kushaq at a similar price is the safer bet.

Kia Seltos

Hyundai Creta

Skoda Kushaq

autocar.india

•2h

This is a genuinely important question, and the answer is not as simple as “ADAS is good” or “ADAS is annoying.” The reality is that ADAS systems are designed for highly standardised road environments, and India is anything but that. In dense city traffic, features like blind spot monitoring and lane keep assist can become a constant source of alerts, leading to exactly the kind of desensitisation you mention. On highways, adaptive cruise control and lane keep assist can work well, but only when lane markings are clear and traffic behaviour is predictable, which is not always the case here. Autonomous emergency braking is a double-edged sword: it can save lives, but in a country where drivers are used to tight gaps and sudden manoeuvres, it can also create new risks.On the consumer choice argument, the current approach of bundling ADAS into top-spec variants is not ideal. Safety should not be a luxury add-on, and buyers should not have to pay for a suite of features they may not use. A modular approach, where ADAS can be added as a standalone package, would be far more sensible. It would allow buyers to make an informed decision based on their driving environment and comfort level with the technology.On the systematic evolution argument, there is some merit to the idea that pushing this technology into the market can drive broader change. As more cars are equipped with ADAS, there is pressure on infrastructure and regulations to catch up. But that only works if the systems are calibrated for local conditions and drivers are properly educated on how to use them. Otherwise, you risk creating frustration rather than progress.The bottom line is that ADAS is not a silver bullet. It is a tool that can enhance safety, but only when it is implemented thoughtfully and used in the right context. Carmakers should give buyers the choice, and regulators should focus on creating the conditions where these systems can actually deliver on their promise.