Autocar India
SV

S Venkatraman

23w

I purchased a Verna Turbo SX(O) DCT automatic in December 2024. Will the cost of ownership be higher in the years to come, considering spare parts and service costs? What would be its resale value now? The car has done 5,600 km to date.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
23w
It is too soon to worry about the maintenance and upkeep costs - you have just bought the Hyundai Verna in December 2024, and have barely driven it for parts to wear and warrant a replacement. So to answer your question, to keep any car in top shape, you will need to spend on its regular service and replacement parts (as required), which will drive up the costs over time.
However, it might not make much sense to sell your barely used vehicle for fear of (future) upkeep costs. If you insist on selling, keep in mind that demand for sedans isn't healthy in the new car market to begin with, which will certainly affect its residual value in the used car market, so be prepared to take a huge depreciation hit. Try getting it evaluated by some reputed used car platforms, such as Spinny, to get a good idea of what value you can expect.
Hyundai Verna

Hyundai Verna

Explore cars mentioned

More questions on similar cars

KP

Kaustubh Patankar

3w

Hello Team Autocar, I am planning to buy a new car and am currently confused between the Honda Amaze and the Skoda Kylaq. Although these belong to different segments, I am seriously considering both. The variants I am looking at are the Honda Amaze VX CVT and the Skoda Kylaq Signature/Signature Plus. Could you please suggest which one would be the better choice, considering reliability, driving experience, after-sales service, and long-term maintenance costs? My usage will mostly involve highway and out-of-town travel, along with occasional city commutes. I would also appreciate your recommendation on the most value-for-money variant to choose.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
25m

With mostly highway and outstation use in mind, we would lean toward the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI automatic, rather than the Honda Amaze VX CVT. The Kylaq will simply feel stronger and more relaxed at highway speeds, rides over bad patches better. It is also very safe and feels solid, which matters on long trips.That pick suits your brief for three reasons. First, the 1.0 turbo engine has enough pull for quick overtakes even with family and bags on board, so highway driving feels easy. Second, the 1.0 automatic uses a proven, reliable, and simple-to-live-with automatic gearbox. Third, the Kylaq’s higher-seating-position suspension makes long hours less tiring than the Amaze's.A few trade-offs to note. The Kylaq’s upfront price and routine service costs will be higher than the Amaze, and Skoda’s service network is not as good as Honda’s, though it has improved. If your use shifts to mostly city and you want the lowest running costs and the widest service reach, the Amaze VX CVT is smoother and easier in traffic, but on highways, it will feel slower, and overtaking requires more effort.Overall, for frequent highway trips and a good driving experience, the Kylaq Signature 1.0 automatic is the best fit for what you want.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleHonda Amaze
AJ

Anurag jalan

5h

I currently own a Toyota Fortuner, two Mahindra Thar Roxx models, and an XUV700. I also previously owned a Scorpio N. I am now planning to sell one of my Thar Roxx vehicles, as it is an early production model and has been giving me several issues. My usage involves daily driving in rough terrain and mountainous conditions, so having a capable 4x4 is essential for me. Before the Roxx, I owned a 3-door Thar, and honestly, given my current usage, the 3-door version seems to suit my needs better. I am now confused about what to buy next. Should I go back to a 3-door Thar, continue with the Roxx, or consider another capable 4x4 option better suited for rough and mountain use?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
55m

Since you've already owned a Mahindra Thar 3-door, and you believe that it is the best for you, we would recommend you go ahead with it. You already know what the vehicle is capable of, and as an owner, you're aware of all its pros and cons too. There are no other options in the market that can deliver what the Thar can.The Maruti Jimny is smaller, very tough, and surprisingly capable, although its engine performance is no match for the Mahindra. The Force Gurkha is capable off-road, but lacks the Thar's sophistication, and feels too crude in comparison. Other monocoque AWD options include the Toyota Hyryder, Maruti Grand Vitara, and Victoris, Mahindra XUV 7XO, and dual-motor EV options like the Vinfast VF7 and Tata Harrier EV. Do note that while all these models will get you through sticky situations and handle mild trails easily, none are as good off-road as the Thar. All things considered, go for the Thar; it seems to be the best fit for you.

VehicleMahindra Thar
VehicleToyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Grand Vitara
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Victoris
VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO

Popular discussions right now

Posted on: 6 Dec 2025