Autocar India
1d

I currently own a 2022 Kia Seltos that has covered 35,000 km. My wife and I are the primary occupants, and we usually take one or two road trips every six months, covering up to 300 km in a day on highways. We are both 66 years old. I plan to continue driving myself for the next five years, after which I expect to hire a chauffeur. I have been considering replacing the Seltos with the MG Hector Savvy CVT 6-seater. Given my usage and future plans, would it be better to make the change now or wait?

Verified
10m

Based on your usage and priorities, there is no compelling reason to change your Kia Seltos right now. Your 2022 Seltos with 35,000 km is still relatively new and well within its prime ownership period. Since you and your wife are usually the only occupants, and your travel is limited to one or two highway trips every six months with a maximum of 300 km a day, moving to a larger 6-seater like the MG Hector Savvy CVT does not offer any meaningful advantage. While the Hector is a comfortable SUV, its larger dimensions and third row are unlikely to be fully utilised based on your current needs. The Seltos is already a comfortable and capable highway car, and it will continue to serve you well for the next five years until you transition to a chauffeur-driven setup. At that point, you can reassess your requirements and choose a more comfort-focused upgrade if needed. For now, keeping the Seltos is the more practical and sensible decision.

VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMG Hector
3d

Is it considered normal for a premium 900cc adventure motorcycle to require a complete cylinder head and valve assembly replacement at around 18,000 km, followed by another major repair or replacement of the valve or cylinder head assembly just 6,500 km later, with the motorcycle having covered only 24,500 km in total? If this is not considered normal, what are the most likely technical reasons for such a recurring failure? From an engineering perspective, would it be advisable to continue with another component-level repair, or does a case like this warrant a more comprehensive solution, such as a complete engine replacement?

Verified
50m

No, this is not normal at all for a premium 900cc adventure motorcycle. Modern engines are designed to last well beyond the odometer crossing 6 figures and requiring another major repair just 6,500 km later strongly points to an underlying issue that has not been properly addressed.The most likely technical reasons for such a recurrence are either a fundamental manufacturing defect in the cylinder head or valve train, improper repair or assembly during the first replacement, or an underlying issue such as oil starvation, cooling problems or incorrect valve clearance adjustment that is causing repeated failure. It could also be related to poor fuel quality, detonation or lubrication issues, but on a premium motorcycle this is far less likely if the bike has been maintained properly.From an engineering perspective, continuing with repeated component-level repairs is not the right approach. If the same failure has occurred twice in such a short mileage, it points to a systemic issue rather than a one-off component failure. At this stage, a complete engine replacement is the more comprehensive and sensible solution, as it eliminates the risk of hidden damage elsewhere in the engine and ensures long-term reliability.Alternatively, we'd also recommend you visit another authorised service centre and get your machine inspected by a trained mechanic. A fresh set of eyes can perhaps provide you with a solution you didn't know was available.

4d

My monthly running is approximately 1,200 km, mostly within the Delhi-NCR region. My family includes my wife, my 11-year-old son, and my mother. I had to sell my beautifully maintained third-generation Honda City V MT because of the 15-year NGT rule in Delhi. In October 2024, I bought a Tata Punch EV S Long Range, which has proven to be tech-loaded, extremely economical to run, comfortable, and very convenient for navigating Delhi's congested roads. However, I still miss having an all-rounder with the character of the third-generation City, especially on highway drives. I have shortlisted two options: the Maruti Suzuki Swift MT and the Maruti Suzuki Jimny AT. I enjoy driving briskly, while staying within legal limits, on highways, which is why the Swift appeals to me. At the same time, my heart is set on Jimny for its classic looks and abilities. I plan to undertake long road trips to destinations such as Keran in Kashmir, Leh-Ladakh, Goa, Arunachal Pradesh, and other parts of the country. Considering my current usage, I may keep just one car in the garage, although I am also open to owning both an EV for city driving and an ICE car for highway trips. With this in mind, I would appreciate your expert advice on the best long-term choice.

Verified
14h

Given your usage and aspirations, the Maruti Suzuki Jimny AT is the better fit. Your monthly running of 1,200 km in Delhi-NCR is well within petrol territory, and your intent to do long road trips to places like Leh and Arunachal points towards a car with capability rather than outright speed. The Swift is a fantastic highway car, but it is ultimately a hatchback and will not give you the sense of adventure or the ability to tackle rough terrain that the Jimny offers. The Jimny, on the other hand, is a purpose-built off-roader with a classic appeal, and it will allow you to explore the kind of destinations you have in mind with confidence. It is not the fastest car on the highway, nor is it spacious, but it is comfortable enough and excels when the going gets tough. Since you already have the Tata Punch EV for city duties, the Jimny can be your dedicated adventure vehicle, and you do not need to compromise by keeping only one car. This combination gives you the best of both worlds: an efficient city runabout and a characterful, capable highway explorer.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Jimny
VehicleTata Punch EV
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Swift
Maruti Suzuki Jimny
Maruti Suzuki Jimny
3d

Hi Autocar India, I recently booked the Maruti Suzuki Brezza LXi Turbo. With a budget of ₹Rs 8–9 lakh, I chose the base variant and plan to add a music system and rear camera later. This is my first new car, and my monthly running will be around 1,000–1,200 km, mostly highway commuting. I chose the Brezza Turbo over the Hyundai Exter HX4 because it offers better value, is a segment above, and suits my highway usage and preference for a higher seating position. I have two questions: First, should I be concerned about the turbo engine with increasing ethanol blending, as some reviewers advise against it? Second, I prefer a simple, low-maintenance car and only need a music system and rear camera apart from the standard LXi features. Can these be installed after a few months in the aftermarket without affecting the warranty, assuming the factory wiring and connectors are already provided? I am open to any other car suggestions that suit my needs if Brezza is not advisable.

Verified
15h

You have made a sensible choice with the Maruti Suzuki Brezza LXi Turbo given your budget and usage. The Brezza will offer you the low maintenance motoring that you want, and since your commute is mostly on highways, the extra power from the turbo will come in handy. Turbo petrols are sensitive to driving style and can very easily be fuel inefficient, especially in the city, but again with your driving mostly on the highway, this should not be that nig of a worry. As for your concerns on E20, all engines today are engineered to handle E20 fuel and most manufacturers including Maruti, have stated that there is a material compatibility tolerance level built in for a slightly higher blend too.As for the music system and rear camera, yes, these can be installed in the aftermarket and generally dealers do not create a warranty issue around this; however, strictly speaking, it can be viewed as grounds for voiding a warranty, especially if the component affected is related to the accessory installed. Thus, if you are worried, then Maruti Suzuki car dealers can also fit these accessories later, which is the safest route from a warranty perspective.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
3d

I’m planning to buy the Kia Seltos GTXO and am confused between the Turbo Petrol Automatic and the Diesel Automatic. My driving is a mix of city commutes and highway trips, although the majority of it is in the city. My annual running is around 10,000 km. I currently drive a diesel-manual Maruti Dzire, so I’m accustomed to the strong mileage of a diesel car. Initially, I was inclined towards the petrol Seltos, but I’m concerned about its lower fuel mileage compared to the diesel. At the same time, while the diesel offers better mileage, it comes with a DPF system that may require additional attention, especially with predominantly city driving. Considering my driving pattern, annual running, and the mix of city and highway usage, which would be the better choice for me: the Kia Seltos GTXO Turbo Petrol Automatic or the Diesel Automatic?

Verified
16h

Go for the Kia Seltos GTXO Turbo Petrol Automatic. With your annual running of around 10,000 km and a majority of city driving, the diesel’s fuel savings will take a long time to offset the higher purchase price. More importantly, the diesel’s DPF system is not ideal for predominantly city usage, as it relies on regular highway runs to regenerate properly. The turbo petrol, paired with the 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, is a strong performer and well suited to your mix of city and highway driving. It is responsive, refined and does not come with the DPF-related concerns of the diesel. Yes, the turbo petrol is not as fuel efficient as the diesel, but given your usage pattern, it is the more sensible and hassle-free choice. If you were doing significantly higher annual mileage with more highway driving, the diesel would make sense, but in your case, the turbo petrol is the better fit.

VehicleKia Seltos
1w

Hello Autocar Team, I have been following Auto India since Hormazd was a part of it and Autocar since its inception. I really like your content, and with the advent of technology, you have reached the zenith of automotive journalism in India. Coming to my question, I took delivery of a 2018 Ford Freestyle 1.5 TDCi BS4 on 25th December 2018 and have been in love with the car ever since. Due to the nature of my job, I drive approximately 400 km a week (70% city and 30% highway), and with Ford's service network dwindling, I am a bit skeptical about retaining the vehicle for the long term. The car is currently covered under an extended warranty until 25th December 2026. Please suggest an alternative in case I decide to replace my vehicle. My budget is around Rs. 15 lakh. Should I consider a new car or a pre-owned one? I am fine with both manual and automatic transmissions.

Verified
18h

If you want to go for car under 15 lakhs, we would recommend going new rather than pre-owned. You are already driving a well-maintained, enthusiast-friendly car, so the upgrade should be about peace of mind and a clear step forward in ownership experience. If you're open to the hatchback body style, we'd recommend the Hyundai i20 N Line DCT. It is a fun-to-drive characterful car. The turbo-petrol-DCT combination is smooth and performance feels more than adequate for daily use. The Fronx or Taisor Turbo AT are cross-hatchbacks with a similar character as your Freestyle.The Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI is another excellent option. It is a genuinely engaging car to drive, with a punchy turbo petrol engine and a well-sorted chassis. It will not match the diesel for running costs, but it is a worthy successor to the Freestyle in terms of driving enjoyment.

VehicleHyundai i20
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Fronx
VehicleToyota Urban Cruiser Taisor
VehicleSkoda Kylaq
Hyundai i20
Hyundai i20