Latest questions answered by experts
Hi, I’m planning to buy new car as my second car for my parents in Kanpur, India specifically as I don’t reside there anymore. I had before Volkswagen Ameo Diesel. Kindly suggest an SUV only within a budget of maximum Rs. 15 lakhs (on-road price).
Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO. It is the best fit for your parents in Kanpur within Rs.15 lakh on-road budget. The 3XO is one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment, with a wide cabin that makes it a genuinely comfortable five-seater. It also offers a good ride quality, which is important for Kanpur’s roads, and Mahindra’s service network is strong in the region. The petrol engine is smooth and easy to drive, making it well-suited for your parents’ usage, and the car is well-equipped for the price. The only real drawback is the boot, which is on the smaller side, but for a second car focused on comfort and ease of use, the 3XO is a very well-rounded package. If you want something with a larger boot, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza is the alternative, but the 3XO offers a more premium and spacious cabin.
Hello, this is Dilip. I’m planning to buy my first car for myself and my parents. I’m 30 years old and am looking for a car under Rs. 20 lakh, preferably with a manual transmission, that offers excellent long-term reliability, low maintenance and ownership costs as well as good safety and build quality. I need a car comfortable for my parents and family with a good driving experience in both city traffic and highways. It should offer good mileage and overall practicality. Suggest me a car that I can confidently keep for 8-10 years. Please suggest the best options based on these requirements and explain both pros and cons of each car.
Go for the Honda Elevate manual. It is the most sensible choice for your requirements. Honda’s naturally aspirated petrol engine is proven, reliable and efficient, and the manual gearbox is smooth and easy to use in both city traffic and on highways. The Elevate is also comfortable for family use, with a spacious cabin and a well-balanced ride, and Honda’s ownership experience is among the best in the segment. It is a car you can confidently keep for 8-10 years without worrying about major reliability or maintenance issues.If you want a slightly more premium feel and a bit more space, the Kia Seltos petrol manual is a good alternative. It offers a more feature-rich cabin and a more premium overall experience, but it is also more expensive and does not offer a significant reliability advantage over the Elevate. Alternatively, consider the Maruti Suzuki Victoris petrol manual. Its powertrain is smooth and efficient and Maruti’s service network is unmatched. Overall, the Honda Elevate manual strikes the best balance between reliability, comfort, safety, driving experience and long-term ownership confidence.
Which automatic SUV car is best for new driver who does not have much confidence? Is CVT transmission will be good in such case and does it come with a light steering. I am planning to buy Honda elevate CVT but it is bit lengthier. Is the steering of Honda elevate light enough for traffic?
The Honda Elevate CVT is actually a very good choice for a new driver who is not very confident. The CVT automatic is extremely smooth and easy to drive, with no perceptible gear changes, which makes it very forgiving in stop-start traffic. The steering is also light at low speeds, making it easy to manoeuvre in tight spaces and heavy traffic. The only concern you have is the length, but the Elevate is not excessively long for its segment and visibility is good, so it should not be a major issue once you get used to the car.If you are still concerned about size, you could consider the Maruti Suzuki Brezza automatic. It is more compact, has light steering and is very easy to drive in the city. Overall, the Elevate CVT remains a strong recommendation. It is easy to drive, reliable and confidence-inspiring. If size is a major concern, the Brezza auto is the best alternative.
Upcoming launch buzz
Community discussions on upcoming launches

BMW
iX facelift

Audi
New Q5

Audi
A6 e-tron

Audi
Q6 e-tron

Audi
e-tron GT facelift

Volkswagen
Virtus facelift

Audi
A5

Vinfast
VF5

Mercedes-Benz Maybach
S-Class facelift

Skoda
Slavia facelift
I am planning to buy a new car under a budget of around Rs. 11.5-12.5 lakh (on-road). It will be mostly used for city driving, with a few highway trips. My main requirements are automatic transmission. good safety rating, good quality interior, low maintenance costs, good driving performance and offers fun-to-drive experience. Please suggest 4-5 good cars in this price range that would suit my requirements.
Based on your requirements, the Mahindra XUV 3XO automatic would be our first recommendation. It is one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment, has a strong safety record, a wide cabin that makes it a genuinely comfortable five-seater, and the turbo petrol engine paired with the torque converter automatic delivers good performance and a fun-to-drive experience. It also offers a well-equipped interior and Mahindra's service network is strong, keeping maintenance costs reasonable.The Skoda Kylaq automatic would be our second recommendation. It is the most driver-focused car in this price range, with a strong turbo petrol engine and a well-tuned chassis that makes it genuinely enjoyable to drive. The torque converter automatic is smooth and reliable, and the Kylaq offers good safety credentials and a solid build quality. The only drawback is that the rear seat is not as spacious as the 3XO.The Maruti Suzuki Brezza automatic is the sensible choice. It is reliable, has low maintenance costs, a comfortable ride and a good safety record. The naturally aspirated petrol engine paired with the torque converter automatic is smooth and easy to live with, making it an excellent city car. It may not be as exciting to drive as the 3XO or Kylaq, but it is a very dependable ownership proposition.The Tata Nexon automatic is also worth considering. It has a strong safety record, a comfortable ride and a feature-rich interior. The turbo petrol engine paired with the DCA automatic offers good performance, but the gearbox can feel a bit hesitant at times in stop-start traffic.Overall, the XUV 3XO automatic strikes the best balance between safety, performance, interior quality and ownership costs. The Kylaq is the enthusiast's choice, while the Brezza is the most sensible long-term option.
Which is a better buy between Maruti Suzuki Brezza VXi Turbo or Tata Nexon Pure Plus? I am interested in usable features. Please suggest accordingly.
Go for the Maruti Suzuki Brezza 1.0 VXi Turbo. It is the better long-term ownership proposition. The Brezza is a proven, reliable product with Maruti's extensive service network and low maintenance costs, which makes it a hassle-free car to own over many years. The 1.0-litre turbo petrol is a refined and relatively efficient engine that delivers more than adequate performance for both city and highway use, and the Brezza is known for its comfortable ride and practical, well-built cabin.The Tata Nexon 1.2 Pure+ Turbo is the more feature-rich car on paper, and the 1.2-litre turbo petrol is the stronger engine. However, Tata's ownership experience is not as consistent as Maruti's, and the Brezza's overall reliability and ease of ownership make it the safer long-term choice.If you are specifically interested in usable features, the Brezza VXi Turbo offers all the essentials you need without overcomplicating the ownership experience.
Hi, I have been happily driving a Polo for the last 4 years and I think that it is the right time to upgrade it to a bigger vehicle because of my mom's back pain. Please suggest a car under 12 lakhs. Thanks a lot.
Given your requirements, the priority should be a car with a comfortable ride, easy ingress and egress, and supportive seats. The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the best fit here. It offers a noticeably more comfortable ride than the Polo, a higher seating position that makes getting in and out easier, and a wide rear seat that is genuinely comfortable for long journeys. It is also one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment, which will make a big difference on family trips. The only real drawback is the boot, which is on the smaller side, but for your budget and requirements, the 3XO strikes the best balance between comfort, space and value. If boot space is a major priority, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza is a good alternative with a larger boot and a similarly comfortable ride, but overall the 3XO is the more complete and spacious package.
I am planning to buy a new car under a budget of Rs. 22-23 lakh. I drive a 12-year old Chevrolet Sail diesel now. I really enjoy driving this car, particularly its MultiJet engine with a good mid-range torque. I value driving dynamics and pleasure of driving more than fuel efficiency and features. I prefer sedan over an SUV. My dad owns a 2022 Skoda Slavia 1.0 MT. I really like that car but in city driving, I've felt noticeable turbo lag at low speeds. Other than that, Slavia is a very good car. So I have shortlisted 2026 Slavia 1.5 TSI DSG. But only thing that I worry about is the reliability of a DSG with its dry clutch system, because I tend to keep the car for at least next 7-8 years. Also, I have doubts about its city driving manners. But I live in a tier-2 city and encounter stop and go traffic rarely. I hit the highways often though. So, will the Slavia 1.5 satisfy my needs coming from a good torquey diesel engine? Another SUV that I am interested is the Duster/Tekton, because I have heard that they are the closest to the German twins in driving pleasure and dynamics. Can I go with the Slavia 1.5 DSG or should I go with Duster/Tekton 1.3 DCT?
Go for the Skoda Slavia 1.5 TSI DSG. You will appreciate the 1.5 TSI's strong mid-range punch and the way it pulls on the highway. Since you live in a tier 2 city with minimal stop-and-go traffic and do frequent highway runs, the DSG should not be a major concern over a 7-8 year ownership period. The 1.5 Slavia also offers a more engaging driving experience than the 1.0 TSI, with noticeably stronger performance and less turbo lag once you are on the move.The Renault Duster/Tekton twins are genuinely good to drive, with excellent ride quality and strong dynamics, but they aren't as involving to drive or as agile as the Slavia. The Slavia also benefits from a more premium cabin and a better overall ownership experience. Overall, the Slavia 1.5 TSI DSG is the car that will keep you happiest over the long term.
I am planning to buy the Kia Seltos but am confused between the 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol and the turbo-petrol DCT. Around 80% of my driving will be in the city, with the remaining 20% being highway and hill-station trips. I will normally be travelling with five passengers. Which engine and gearbox would be better for my usage?
Go for the Kia Seltos 1.5 naturally aspirated petrol IVT. With 80% city driving, the IVT automatic is the better choice. It is smooth, reliable and well suited to stop-start traffic, and the 1.5 NA engine is refined and easy to live with. The turbo petrol DCT is the enthusiast's choice, but the DCT gearbox can feel jerky at low speeds and is not as well suited to heavy city traffic. The 1.5 NA is also more reliable and easier to maintain in the long run.For your 20% highway and hill station runs with five passengers, the 1.5 NA will do the job. It is not the most powerful engine, but it is adequate for steady cruising and occasional climbs. If you regularly drive fully loaded in the hills and want stronger performance, the turbo petrol is the better performer, but for your usage pattern, the 1.5 NA IVT is the more sensible choice.
I’m considering buying a pre-owned 2021 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SE R-Dynamic with the 2.0-litre Ingenium petrol engine and AWD. It has covered only 15,000km, was manufactured and registered in 2021, and is a BS6 vehicle. The fuel flap says “Premium Gasoline Recommended, 91”. I want to confirm whether this generation and engine are compatible with E20 petrol. Also, should I buy it? I’m looking to enter the premium SUV segment with a budget of around Rs 40 lakh.
The 2021 Range Rover Evoque SE R-Dynamic 2.0L Ingenium petrol is a BS6-compliant engine, but it is not officially certified for E20 fuel. The “Premium Gasoline Recommended, 91” label refers to octane rating, not ethanol content. In India, regular petrol is now 95 octane, so you do not need to use premium fuel unless the manufacturer specifically requires it. The bigger question is ethanol compatibility. BS6 engines were designed with some ethanol tolerance, but E20 certification only became mandatory for new models from April 2023 onwards. Land Rover has not issued a blanket statement confirming E20 compatibility for older BS6 models.Should you buy it? At Rs 40 lakh, a lightly used Evoque is a tempting entry into the premium SUV segment. The Evoque offers a genuinely premium cabin, strong performance and a distinctive design. However, ownership costs are high. Land Rover parts and service are expensive, and long-term reliability is not as bulletproof as some German rivals. If you are buying this as a weekend car or a second car, it makes sense. If this is your only car and you plan to keep it for 5-10 years, you need to be comfortable with higher maintenance costs.On E20, the reality is that most modern BS6 engines will run on E20 without immediate issues, but long-term durability is unproven. Ethanol can accelerate wear on certain rubber and plastic fuel system components over time.Overall, buy the Evoque if you want a premium SUV experience and are comfortable with higher running costs. If you want a lower-risk, long-term ownership experience, a new Kia Seltos, Hyundai Creta or Skoda Kushaq at a similar price is the safer bet.
I bought a used 2017 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 MPI Highline Cup Edition from Spinny and really enjoy driving it. However, the engine feels underpowered while overtaking and on uphill stretches. I know the 1.2 MPI does not respond dramatically to tuning, but I have seen several videos on tuning MPI engines, and none clearly explain the exact power and torque gains. There are also mixed opinions online about different tuners. I am looking for a decent 10hp increase with minimal changes to the engine and definitely do not want pops and bangs. Could you suggest a good tuner in Bengaluru for the 1.2 MPI for this requirement? Also, is it always recommended to get a Volkswagen serviced at an authorised service centre, or are independent workshops a better option? Could you suggest some good service centres in Bengaluru for a Volkswagen Polo?
You are absolutely right that the 1.2 MPI is not an engine that responds dramatically to tuning. It is a naturally aspirated unit with limited headroom, so expecting a meaningful +10bhp gain with minimal changes is unrealistic. A remap can sharpen throttle response and marginally improve drivability, but the actual power and torque gains will be modest at best. Most reputable tuners will be honest about this, and the divisive opinions online are often a result of unrealistic expectations rather than poor tuning.In Bengaluru, we do not have any experience with a tuner we can recommend, but suggest you look at the more established names with experience on VW MPI engines. They focus on sensible, reliability-first remaps rather than headline-grabbing numbers. However, even with the best tuner, the gains will be incremental rather than transformative.On servicing, Volkswagen authorised service centres are the safest bet for a 2017 Polo, especially if you want to maintain the car well and avoid any ambiguity with parts or procedures. That said, there are a few independent VW specialists in Bengaluru who are well regarded, such as Car Smith Motors and VAG Tune. They can often offer more personalised attention and a better understanding of older VW cars, but it is important to check their reputation and experience with the Polo specifically.Overall, enjoy the Polo for what it is: a well-built, fun-to-drive hatchback. Keep your expectations realistic with tuning. If you want a significant performance increase, moving to a turbocharged car is the more effective solution.
Every new car review emphasises the ADAS suite, justifying the hefty price tag of top-tier variants by highlighting how these features revolutionise safety. However, real-world driving conditions, especially on chaotic, high-density Indian city roads, often tell a different story. In bumper-to-bumper city traffic, features like Blind Spot Monitoring can become a constant audio-visual nuisance, leading to driver desensitisation. Even on highways, using Adaptive Cruise Control or Lane Keep Assist requires a massive leap of faith, while Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) risks triggering a rear-end collision if it misinterprets a tight gap and brakes abruptly. Given this friction between global tech and local infrastructure, I want to explore two perspectives: 1. The Consumer Choice Argument: Should carmakers force ADAS into expensive top-spec bundles, or should they offer these safety suites as a modular, standalone option so buyers don't pay for tech they immediately turn off? 2. The Systematic Evolution Argument: Is forcing this technology onto the market the right catalyst to eventually push Indian drivers, road infrastructure, and government regulations to mature into a safer, more standardised ecosystem?
This is a genuinely important question, and the answer is not as simple as “ADAS is good” or “ADAS is annoying.” The reality is that ADAS systems are designed for highly standardised road environments, and India is anything but that. In dense city traffic, features like blind spot monitoring and lane keep assist can become a constant source of alerts, leading to exactly the kind of desensitisation you mention. On highways, adaptive cruise control and lane keep assist can work well, but only when lane markings are clear and traffic behaviour is predictable, which is not always the case here. Autonomous emergency braking is a double-edged sword: it can save lives, but in a country where drivers are used to tight gaps and sudden manoeuvres, it can also create new risks.On the consumer choice argument, the current approach of bundling ADAS into top-spec variants is not ideal. Safety should not be a luxury add-on, and buyers should not have to pay for a suite of features they may not use. A modular approach, where ADAS can be added as a standalone package, would be far more sensible. It would allow buyers to make an informed decision based on their driving environment and comfort level with the technology.On the systematic evolution argument, there is some merit to the idea that pushing this technology into the market can drive broader change. As more cars are equipped with ADAS, there is pressure on infrastructure and regulations to catch up. But that only works if the systems are calibrated for local conditions and drivers are properly educated on how to use them. Otherwise, you risk creating frustration rather than progress.The bottom line is that ADAS is not a silver bullet. It is a tool that can enhance safety, but only when it is implemented thoughtfully and used in the right context. Carmakers should give buyers the choice, and regulators should focus on creating the conditions where these systems can actually deliver on their promise.
I am planning to buy a VinFast VF7 with the 70.8kWh battery pack. However, after going through various online videos of users reporting serious issues such as paint chipping, suspension leaks, dashboard cracks and inefficient service support, I am having second thoughts. The trouble is that options such as the Mahindra BE 6 and XEV 9e also have user-reported issues, particularly around software. Is buying an EV in the Rs 25-30 lakh price range risky? If not, which would you choose between the VF7, BE 6 and XEV 9e? There will be three rear passengers.
The VinFast VF7 is a genuinely interesting product, but your concerns are valid. The brand is still relatively new in India, and while the car itself is well-specced, there have been reports of quality and service inconsistencies. That said, the Mahindra BE 6 and XEV 9e are not without their own issues, particularly around software glitches and niggles.The bigger question is whether an electric car in the Rs 25-30 lakh range is inherently risky. The answer is no, but you do need to be realistic. This is still a relatively young segment, and even established manufacturers are ironing out teething issues. The key is to buy from a brand with a strong service network and a proven track record of resolving problems quickly.Between the three, the Mahindra XEV 9e is the safer choice. It is a more mature product, has a stronger service network and compared to the BE 6, it is much more practical. The VF7 is the wildcard. It is a genuinely compelling product, but the brand's service and support ecosystem is still developing.With three rear passengers, the XEV 9e is also the better choice. It has a wider rear bench and better overall space management than the VF7, which is more of a coupe-style SUV. The BE 6 also suffers from a space perspective and is not as complete as the XEV 9e.

Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.



