Autocar India
2d

I am a first-time buyer and confused about whether to buy the Tata Taigo Pure+ AMT, Hyundai i10 Sportz AMT or Swift VXi Opt AMT. I will use the car for occasional city as well as highway driving and not for everyday commuting. Please suggest the best option or any other option available around this budget range. Also, please suggest if I should but cng for this type of usage or stick to a petrol car.

Verified
2h

For your usage, we would recommend the Maruti Suzuki Swift VXi (O) AMT. As a first-time buyer with occasional city and highway driving, the Swift strikes the best balance of reliability, ease of ownership and driving comfort. The new Swift is a well-rounded hatchback with a refined engine, good fuel efficiency and a proven ownership experience. The AMT is smooth enough for city use, and the car feels stable and confidence-inspiring on the highway.The Tata Tiago Pure+ AMT is a strong value proposition with a solid build and good safety credentials, but the Swift has a more refined engine and a more consistent ownership experience. The Hyundai Grand i10 Nios Sportz AMT is also a good option with a comfortable ride and a feature-rich cabin, but the Swift feels more engaging to drive and has a stronger resale value.On the CNG question, we would recommend sticking to petrol. CNG only makes financial sense if you have high monthly running, and for occasional city and highway use, petrol is the more convenient and hassle-free option. You avoid the compromises of reduced boot space too.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Swift
VehicleTata Tiago
VehicleHyundai Grand i10 Nios
11h

Hi Autocar Team, I am planning to buy my first car and am confused between the Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX A MT Petrol and the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi+ Turbo MT Petrol. I feel the Brezza offers better value for money, more features, and is actually priced lower than the 3XO. At the same time, I understand that the Brezza offers better reliability, fuel efficiency, and long-term peace of mind. However, the 3XO feels more premium and, from what I have heard, offers a better ride quality. I plan to keep the car for 10 years or more, so long-term ownership is an important factor. Could you please suggest which of these two would be the better choice for my requirements?

Verified
5h

Go for the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi+ turbo MT petrol. For a first car with a 10+ year ownership plan, the Brezza works well. Maruti’s service network, proven reliability and lower long-term maintenance costs make it a stress-free ownership proposition. The Brezza’s turbo petrol engine is also well-suited to Indian conditions, offering good drivability and efficiency without being overly complex. The Mahindra XUV 3XO RevX A MT petrol does make sense too, but we would lean towards it more if a peppy and lively drive feel is what you are after. Overall, the ride and handling balance is better with the 3XO, which has a good mix of city comfort and high-speed stability. The Brezza, however, leans towards the city with a much more pliant ride at low speeds. Thus for you keeping in mind a long ownership period, we would lean towards the Brezza.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
21h

My requirement is a 6-7 seater vehicle. For low maintenance cost, I can go with either CNG or diesel car as my monthly running is 1000 km and occasionally it can be as high as 2000-3000 km monthly. I am from Pune and my frequent outstation routes will be Mumbai, Kolhapur, Latur and Kokan area (ghat sections). Also, since I can rent it out as self driving car and I will own upto 7-10 years. I have owned Alto, Wagon R, SX4, EON and i20 active disel. I have mentioned vehicles so that you can understand my driving and owning experience.

Verified
11h

Given your requirements, the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga CNG is the most sensible recommendation. Your monthly running of around 1,000 km, with occasional spikes, does not justify a diesel, especially with the higher purchase cost and maintenance associated with modern diesel engines. The Ertiga CNG strikes the right balance between low running costs, reliability and practicality. It is a proven 7-seater with a comfortable ride, good service network and low maintenance costs, which is important given your plan to keep the car for 7-10 years. The CNG system is factory-fitted and well-integrated, making it a far better option than any aftermarket CNG installation. The only drawback is the reduced boot space with the CNG tank, but for your usage pattern and occasional rental plans, the overall cost savings outweigh this limitation. If you need more space and comfort, the Maruti Suzuki XL6 CNG is a good alternative, offering a more premium cabin and captain seats in the middle row making it a strict 6-seater, but the Ertiga remains the more value-driven choice. Alternatively, there is also the Toyota Rumion, which is Toyota's version of the Ertiga so if there is a lower waiting time, you can check out the Rumion too.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki XL6
VehicleToyota Rumion
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Ertiga
2d

I'm planning to buy my first premium motorcycle and have a budget of around Rs. 3.1 lakh on-road. After a lot of research and multiple test rides, I've narrowed my options down to the Triumph Tracker 400 and the Triumph Scrambler 400 X. I'm looking for advice from owners or experienced riders who have spent time with either or both bikes. I've been riding motorcycles for around 7-8 years and this bike will be my primary motorcycle for at least the next 4-5 years. My usage will be approximately 70-80% city commuting to office and 20-30% rides during weekend with occasional long-distance trips of more than 250 km every 2-3 months. I will almost always have a pillion with me, so pillion comfort, suspension, and overall ride quality are very important factors. I enjoy riding but I'm not someone who rides aggressively all the time. I appreciate a refined, confidence-inspiring motorcycle that is also enjoyable on open highways. I'll be paying the full amount in cash so I'm looking for the best overall ownership experience rather than simply the cheapest option. During my test rides, the Tracker 400 felt lighter, more road-focused, and easier to ride in the city. It had a cowl so didn't get to check it with the pillion. The Scrambler 400 X engine felt somewhat the same but just a little toned down and not as aggresive as the Tracker given the higher power produced and better suspension. However, the braking was not as expected. My main concerns are related to finding more suitable bike for someone who rides mostly in the city but enjoys weekend touring. Which bike is more comfortable for both rider and pillion on longer rides? Does the Scrambler's taller suspension and larger front wheel become a disadvantage in daily city riding? Is the Tracker significantly easier to live with in traffic? Considering the fact that I'll own the bike for 4-5 years, which one offers the better overall ownership experience? I'd really appreciate insights from owners, especially those who have ridden both motorcycles or regularly ride with a pillion. Thanks in advance!

Verified
11h

For your usage, where you regularly ride with a pillion both usually inside the city and occassionally on the highway, the Triumph Scrambler 400 X is the better option than its sibling, the Tracker. The Scrambler has a far more upright and commanding rider's triangle, is more spacious for both rider and pillion and its suspension comfort is also much better than the Tracker. Coming to the braking issue on the Scrambler, Triumph (not Bajaj) insists on equipping the bike with organic brake pads which don't have the same life or power as sintered units but its an easy fix. You can fit the sintered pads from any other 350cc Triumph onto the Scrambler and this will be an inexpensive and easy fix to your problem.

Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Triumph Tracker 400
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
4d

I am confused between the Hyundai Grand i10 Nios Sportz AMT, Maruti Suzuki Swift AMT, and Tata Tiago Pure+ AMT. As a first-time buyer and driver with very low to moderate city and highway use, please help me choose the best car. Also, based on my usage, should I consider a CNG car or stick to my original plan of buying a petrol car? Please also suggest any better alternative available in this price range.

Verified
13h

For a first-time buyer with low-to-moderate city and highway use, the Maruti Suzuki Swift AMT is the best fit. It is an easy car to drive in the city, with light steering, smooth AMT and a very user-friendly nature that makes it ideal for new drivers. The cabin is well finished, the ride is comfortable, and Maruti's service network is strong, which adds to long-term peace of mind.The Hyundai i10 Nios has a slightly more refined engine, but it is not as efficient as the Swift, and the cabin is not as spacious either. The Tata Tiago Pure Plus AMT is the value pick, but the powertrain is the least refined of the three and Tata’s service consistency is still not as strong as Hyundai or Maruti.On CNG, it only makes sense if your running is high enough to justify the higher upfront cost and lower boot space. For low to moderate use, petrol is the better choice. If you want a slightly larger car, the Maruti Suzuki Baleno AMT is a solid choice for not a lot more money, but overall the Swift AMT is the most balanced and easiest car to live with for a first-time buyer.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Swift
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Baleno
VehicleTata Tiago
VehicleHyundai Grand i10 Nios
Maruti Suzuki Swift
Maruti Suzuki Swift
2d

I want to buy a car with an automatic gearbox for city commuting. My budget is under Rs 3 lakh. Would a 2014 Maruti Suzuki Celerio AGS be a good choice? I am hoping I won’t face major issues, as the vehicle is more than 10 years old. If not, please suggest another automatic option under Rs 3 lakh.

Verified
14h

For a budget under Rs 3 lakh and a requirement for an automatic gearbox for city commuting, the Maruti Suzuki Celerio AGS is actually a sensible choice. The AGS (Automated Manual Transmission) is simple and reliable, but if the actuators go wrong, they can be expensive to replace; however, this is for any automated manual transmission car. Given Maruti Suzuki’s service network, parts availability will not be a problem. The Celerio is also compact and easy to drive in traffic, which is exactly what you want for city use.That said, at 10+ years old, the condition of the individual car becomes far more important than the model itself. The AGS system is generally reliable, but like any mechanical component, it can develop issues if the car has not been well maintained. Make sure you get a thorough inspection done, check the service history and look for any signs of gearbox hesitation or rough shifting.If you are open to alternatives, the Hyundai Grand i10 Automatic (torque converter) is worth considering. It is smoother than the AGS and also reliable, though again you must check the condition of the actual car. It would be wise to buy from a reputed seller, as there could be some limited warranty available too.

1d

Being a Maruti Suzuki customer for 15 years now and I am very much used to hassle free ownership considering Brezza ZXI+ Petrol AT NA engine compared to TCMPFI AT in 3XO or Nexon DCA (dropped due to DCA). However, considering upfront extra cost for Brezza coupled with smart hybrid replacement possibility and no spare wheel, I am simply unable to convince myself to go for Brezza top variant as I like 360 camera feature. With my congested traffic city driving around 500-800 km per month, will it be still worth to pay additional 2.30 lakh rupees compared to any car in segment, only for Maruti Suzuki brand especially when competition is offering so much more for such a lesser price than Brezza top variant. Lesser mileage costs also gets compensated for any turbo engine with lesser purchase cost than Brezza.

Verified
1d

You should definitely go for the Brezza ZXi+ AT if you are used to Maruti's hassle-free ownership experience and running costs as no other car in the segment comes close on that front. It is not more expensive than top variants of the Nexon or XUV 3XO, which in fact cost around Rs. 1 lakh more, on road, and instead it is one of the more reasonably priced cars in the segment, despite not qualifying for small-car tax benefits with the 1.5-litre engine. With the latest version, you get a few more features too, like ventilated seats and some driver assist features, but overall, it is not as well equipped as others in the segment. Despite having a larger engine and a torque-converter automatic gearbox, the Brezza AT is more fuel efficient than most other cars in the segment, especially the turbo-petrols, which drink a lot when you drive them eagerly. We would recommend checking the prices again on our website or with your local dealers, as all things considered, the Brezza does seem like the best deal for you.

VehicleMaruti Suzuki Brezza
VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO