Autocar India
•19w

We currently own a used 2013 Toyota Innova along with a 2013 Swift, and use the Innova for both long journeys and daily driving. We bought it for Rs 8 lakh. Now, we are considering either a used 2016 Innova or an Innova Crysta. We need good mileage, diesel, comfort and good looks. What should we buy, and what should we check before purchasing?

Verified
•19w
Based on your usage, we would recommend buying a used Toyota Innova Crysta 2.4 diesel manual. It is a better fit than the older 2016 Innova because the Crysta feels noticeably more modern, more comfortable on long drives and significantly more refined overall. The 2.4 diesel manual is also considerably stronger than the older 2.5 diesel, and you will especially feel that extra performance on highways while overtaking or cruising with a full family on board. It is quieter inside, feels steadier at highway speeds, and the overall jump in comfort and safety over the older Innova is quite meaningful.
While buying used, try to stick to single-owner cars with full Toyota service history. Check cold start (no smoke, smooth idle), look for clutch slip and smooth gear shifts, listen for injector and suspension noises, make sure it tracks straight and tyres wear evenly, and that ABS/airbag lights go off after start. Test AC on a hot day, check all doors, windows, and lights, and scan for flood signs (musty smell, damp carpets, rust under seats). Confirm no taxi use, match odometer with records, check insurance claim history, RTO papers, pollution certificate, both keys, and spare wheel and tools. Overall, for your use, a well-kept Crysta 2.4 diesel manual lines up best.

Was this helpful? Ask a follow-up

•19w•

We have a budget of below 11L which variant is good for us we want something that has ambient lights and has projectors as everyone is using led nowadays

More posts on similar cars

•5d

I’m looking to buy a car for a first-time woman driver who will primarily be driving in the city. I’m considering the Maruti Swift ZXi+ AGS and Skoda Kylaq Classic Plus AT. She prefers an upright seating position and the SUV stance, which makes the Kylaq appealing, but I’m not sure which of the two would be easier to drive, especially for a new driver. I already own an i20 MT, so I’m also wondering how the Swift and Kylaq would compare in terms of ease of driving and overall city usability.

Verified
•4d

Go for the Skoda Kylaq Classic Plus AT. Since she prefers an upright seating position and an SUV stance, the Kylaq is the better fit. The higher seating position gives a better view of the road, which is reassuring for a first-time driver, and the SUV-like stance makes it easier to judge the car’s corners in traffic. The 6-speed torque converter automatic is smooth and predictable, making city driving stress-free, but there is turbo lag which needs getting used to. Aside from that, the Kyalq is a good choice, compact enough to be easy to park and manoeuvre, while still feeling more substantial and confidence-inspiring than a hatchback.The Maruti Suzuki Swift ZXI+ AMT is a great city car and very easy to drive, but the AGS (AMT) gearbox is not as smooth as the Kylaq’s torque converter automatic, especially in stop-start traffic. Since you already own an Hyundai i20, the Swift would feel like a similar experience, whereas the Kylaq offers a genuinely different and more confidence-inspiring driving position. The Kylaq is the better long-term choice for her needs.

VehicleSkoda Kylaq
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Swift
VehicleHyundai i20
•1d

I’m planning to purchase a car that can accommodate 3-4 adults. There will be some city driving, but high-traffic conditions will be less frequent. I will also be taking occasional family trips of 300-1,000 km, possibly slightly more, on plains and hilly terrain such as Himachal and Jammu & Kashmir, but not Ladakh. I’m not looking for rapid acceleration, but I do want decent pulling power with the AC switched on, usually at around 24-25°C. I currently have an old Maruti Alto (not the K10 series). I haven’t taken it to Himachal, but it performs okay on moderately hilly terrain with the AC on mildly. Would the Tata Punch petrol manual be a decent purchase? What about the AMT version? I’m concerned that it might feel underpowered. Or would the Tata Punch petrol be a better option? What other options would you suggest? My first choice is to keep my budget between Rs. 10-11 lakh on-road, though I could stretch it by another Rs. 2-3 lakh if essential. Thanks in advance.

Verified
•17h

For your usage, the Punch petrol manual would be a better fit than the Altroz petrol. Its 193mm ground clearance and good ride quality make it better suited to Himachal and Jammu & Kashmir roads, while the 88hp 1.2-litre petrol has enough pulling power for three to four adults as long as expectations are realistic.The Punch AMT would not be our pick for this usage. The 1.2 petrol is already not particularly strong when fully loaded and climbing, and the AMT can feel slow when you need a quick response. The turbo petrol is considerably stronger at 120hp and 170Nm, but it is manual only, so the 1.2 manual is the sensible choice if you want to stay close to Rs 10-11 lakh.If you are willing to stretch towards Rs 12 lakh, the Skoda Kylaq 1.0 TSI AT would also be worth considering, particularly if you want stronger highway performance and an automatic.

VehicleTata Punch
VehicleTata Altroz
VehicleSkoda Kylaq

Popular discussions right now

Upcoming launch buzz

Community discussions on upcoming launches

Want to sell your car?

Sell your car at the right price, without the stress.

Posted on: 21 May 2026