SH
Shravan
•20wWhich is better, the AMT or the DCT in the Fronx Delta+ and Zeta variants? How different are they in driving experience and efficiency for moderate daily driving?
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here

Autocar India
The Maruti Suzuki Fronx comes with a torque converter automatic, not a DCT, and the difference between that and an AMT is significant. The torque converter feels more premium, is smoother, and responds much quicker. What makes an even bigger difference is the turbo-petrol engine paired with this gearbox, offering noticeably more power and torque, making it far more effortless to drive.
In contrast, the AMT is mated to the naturally aspirated 1.2-litre engine, which, while adequate, isn’t as exciting. However, the turbo-petrol with the torque converter does lose out on value, as it costs nearly ₹3 lakh more at over ₹13 lakh on-road.
At that price, you could also consider better alternatives, like the Skoda Kushaq AT in the Signature variant or the newly launched Hyundai Venue DCT in the HX variant, both of which make more sense overall.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx
Explore cars mentioned
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here
Got a suggestion for Shravan?
Add a Comment
Related questions you may find helpful
Posted on: 10 Nov 2025
Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here
Share your real-world experience
Be the first to help
Got a suggestion? Write it here


