Autocar India
MB

Manivanna Balaji

15w

I’ve owned a Bajaj CT100 for over 7 years and am planning to buy a Duke 200 mainly for strong city performance. However, I didn’t like the 2026 update. Is there any chance of the Duke 200 getting the Gen 3 design this year? I like the Gen 3 design, but the Duke 250 is a bit expensive for me.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
12w
There are no plans to move the 200 Duke to the Gen 3 KTM Duke design language currently. The 160 and 200 Duke models will continue to be sold with their existing designs for quite some time, with perhaps minor changes to the colour and graphics periodically.
KTM 200 Duke

KTM 200 Duke

Explore bikes mentioned

More questions on similar bikes

RS

Rahul Sinha

2d

Hi, I am thinking of adding a second bike to my garage (my primary bike is a Ducati Scrambler, which I have ridden for over 12,000 km in the last two years). My primary use case for the second bike is that it should be city-friendly, lightweight, capable of handling a pillion for city commutes, and still be fun to ride with good handling in the twisties (for quick breakfast rides, though the Scrambler will handle most of those). I have shortlisted the Duke 160 and 200. The new 200 now has the same weight savings as the 160, and both bikes are only ₹18,000 apart. I have test ridden the 160 multiple times and found it to be smooth (unlike a typical KTM), with decent torque in the low to mid rev range and a step up in power post 6,000 RPM for some fun. I haven’t been able to test ride the new 200 yet. I have been told that it feels more crude in comparison, requires higher revs to perform well, heats up quickly, and has some vibrations. Which bike would suit my use case better?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Between 160 and 200 Duke models, we'd steer you toward the 200 Duke because it seems like you're looking for a fun machine and since you already have a bigger machine at home, the 160 could feel a little bland as time wears on. The 200 Duke has a rev-happy nature like the 160 Duke and with its added firepower, it makes for a good second machine, especially considering that the price difference between the two isn't all that large. If we're being honest, you should actually also take a look at the 250 Duke because it is a genuine step up over the 200 and if you're going to keep the bike for a while, go the whole hog and get something that will keep you entertained for a longer period. In our experience, we've found the latest-gen 250 Duke to be a sweet middle child of sorts in the KTM lineup, which offers everyday versatility with engaging performance when you want it. Over the 200 Duke, the 250 also doesn't cost a lot more and we'd recommend you stretch your budget if you can and get the quarter-litre Duke if you can.Take a test ride of the 250 Duke to see if you resonate with this KTM bike and then make your decision.

KTM 250 Duke
KTM 160 Duke
KTM 200 Duke
SK

Sunil Kumar Rajapitamahuni

3d

Hi Autocar India. First of all, thank you for being a trusted source for automobile reviews. Coming to my question, I own a Honda CB300R. Despite all its shortcomings, I love the bike as it is compact, nimble, and has a smooth, high-revving motor. However, one thing I cannot compromise on is its dead, wooden brakes. They don’t inspire the confidence the bike otherwise deserves. Could you please advise if I can replace the brake pads with an aftermarket unit that improves braking performance? If yes, which brand would you recommend? Thank you, Autocar India, in advance.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

Wooden brakes are commonplace on most Japanese machines despite the bike having good braking hardware. In the CB300R's case, a radial Nissin caliper and a petal disc paired with an axially-mounted Nissin master cylinder are on stopping duty - in theory, this should be more than enough to bring the petite 146kg CB to a halt quickly and reassuringly. Since you mentioned that your brake feel is quite dead and wooden, the first area you should look at are brake pads. If your current pads are worn out, we'd advise switching to some sintered ones from reputed manufacturers like SBS, EBC, Vesrah or Galfer. While you're at it, a flush and refill of the brake fluid should also be carried out and these two alone should solve your problem. Upgrading your rubber brake hose to a steel braided one will be a worthwhile and inexpensive upgrade especially if you plan to keep your bike long-term. In case your bike has clocked over 25,000-30,000km, then inspecting the brake disc thickness and replacing it with an OEM one should also be on your to-do list.

SS

Shivansh Srivastava

3d

My build is 5 ft 10 in and 86 kg. I am looking for a bike for city/office commuting under ₹3 lakh. Since Mumbai roads are known for potholes and speed breakers, good suspension and a comfortable riding posture (to minimize back pain) are essential. A bike that can comfortably run at higher gears or any mechanism to enable lazy riding (quickshifter) would be a preferable add-on. I currently have two bikes in mind: the RE Classic 350 (great lugging capability, comfortable seat, neutral riding posture, though I am unsure about long-term back comfort) and the TVS RTX 300 (great suspension and quickshifter, though I am unsure about its city usability). Please suggest, and feel free to include options beyond these.

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
1d

Both the machines you've shortlisted are great ones for commuting within Mumbai but have different characters. The Royal Enfield Classic 350's smooth thumper is known for its low-end torque and encourages you to ride in a relaxed fashion. Its seating posture and suspension comfort both are excellent at keeping the rider shielded from road imperfections and should be good enough for you. We'd also recommend you take a look at the Honda CB350 models if you want a similiar riding experience with a little less weight and clutch effort. If instead, you want a quicker and more modern-feeling machine, then the TVS Apache RTX 300 is a great option to consider. The RTX has a tractable engine but its smaller motor cannot be lugged around in higher gears like the Classic's engine can. However, the Apache has a much higher performance ceiling and a lot of electronic features (including a bidirectional quickshifter, from the Top variant onwards) if that sounds appealing to you.You should also consider the Hero Xpulse 210 because this bike has lovely suspension and upright, commanding ergonomics - both great attributes to tackle Mumbai's largely subpar roads. The Xpulse will be slower than the RTX but quicker than the air-cooled 350s and you can expect it to be the most fuel efficient of the lot, when ridden sensibly. A test ride of these bikes should help you decide which is the best fit for you.

Hero MotoCorp Xpulse 210
Honda Bikes CB350
TVS Apache RTX
Royal Enfield Classic 350

Popular discussions right now

SU

Surendar

5d

I am buying my first bike, with most of my riding being in the city with occasional pillion rider. I am 5'11" and on the heavier side. I have tested the Ronin, T4, and CB350 H'ness, but I am confused about which one to choose. Are there any other good options under ₹2.5 lakh?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

In the relaxed neo-retro space, you've already ridden the TVS Ronin and the Honda CB350 H'ness, that are two of the best bikes available in the class. We would also recommend you look at the Royal Enfield Bullet / Classic 350 because these bikes still remain the benchmark in the class, in our opinion. Especially since you've mentioned you're a heavier person and carry a pillion regularly. The Classic and Bullet both have lovely seating comfort, sorted suspension and neutral ergonomics. Pair that to a torque-rich engine and lovely fit and finish and you have a concoction that's hard to top - unless you're looking for more performance, that is. In that case, the 350cc Triumph Speed T4 makes a good case for itself although do bear in mind, it isn't as large a machine as the Honda bike or Royal Enfield 350s and could feel cramped for a larger rider as well as pillion. If you're open to considering ADVs, the Hero Xpulse 210 makes a compelling case for itself and will offer you more comfort and fuel economy than any of the machines listed above. Take a test ride of these bikes and compare them with your notes of previous test rides to see which one you like best before you make a decision.

Triumph Speed T4
TVS Ronin
Royal Enfield Classic 350
Royal Enfield Bullet 350
Hero MotoCorp Xpulse 210
SU

Sunny

5d

I’m planning to buy a one-bike garage solution and intend to use it for office and city commuting in traffic, as well as highway trips. I’m also interested in taking up off-roading as a hobby and improving my skills in it. I’m 6 feet tall, and considering my comfort and the above requirements, I believe an adventure bike would be the right choice. I test rode the Triumph Scrambler 400 X and really liked its ergonomics. However, after riding the Guerrilla 450, I found the Triumph’s engine somewhat underwhelming in comparison. I’m also planning to test ride the KTM 390 Adventure with the new 350cc engine, but I feel it might have a similar issue as the Triumph. At this point, I feel that the Himalayan 450 would best meet all my requirements. Would you recommend increasing my budget by ₹60,000 and going for the Himalayan 450, considering both overall benefits and long-term ownership costs?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

The Royal Enfield Guerrilla comes with a 452cc engine, whereas the Triumph Scrambler 400 X now comes with a 349cc engine so its no surprise that the Triumph didn't feel as sprightly in comparison. However, for your usage, should you be willing to sacrifice some pep, the 350cc Scrambler 400 X is actually a great all-rounder. Especially since you're a novice and want to get into off-roading. The Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 is a great bike but we'd advise you to not consider this bike, at least not if you plan to start your off-roading journey with it. At 196kg, the Himalayan is a heavy machine and with its fuel tank full, it also feels rather top heavy, which could get challenging for a beginner to manage at crawling off-road speeds. However, for city commuting and highway journeys, this Royal Enfield bike will be quite nice - its only off-roading where its weight will be a serious deterrent.The 350cc KTM 390 Adventure would be a good middle-ground option between the two aforementioned bikes - in theory, at least. Its lighter than the Himalayan and has more power than the Scrambler. A test ride should shed more light on whether this KTM bike is the one for you. Since you said you're looking to get into off-road riding, we'd be remiss if we didn't recommend the Hero Xpulse 210 to you. Now, the Xpulse is definitely a smaller and slower machine than all the machines listed above but if you genuinely want to hone your craft and get better at off-road riding, there's genuinely no better place to start than here. City commuting is another strength of the Xpulse, although on the highway, its engine feels a little stressed post 100kph. If you don't mind compromising on outright performance on the highway, then the Xpulse will be a good option for you. Some other benefits of choosing the Xpulse would be that it returns excellent fuel economy - much higher than all other options - and it costs much less to buy too.You need to evaluate your priorities and make an informed decision after test riding all three bikes. Best of luck!

Royal Enfield Himalayan
Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
KTM 390 Adventure
Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Hero MotoCorp Xpulse 210
SR

sagar rathod

5d

Hello, I want to buy the Triumph Scrambler 400 X. I am quite confused and concerned about its service and maintenance costs, so I would like advice from an expert. Should I go for the Triumph or the RE Guerrilla 450?

Autocar India team

Autocar India

Verified
2d

First things first, service and maintenance on both the Triumph Scrambler 400 X and Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 should be light on your wallet. Both bikes are made in India and spares as well as replacement cycle parts are readily available.Coming to choosing between the Scrambler and Guerrilla, that's actually where things get complicated. You see, the Scrambler 400 X is actually powered by a 350cc engine making 40hp/32Nm while the Guerrilla's 452cc single makes 40hp/40Nm. While these bikes seem pretty closely matched in terms of peak power on paper at least, the Royal Enfield bike is sure to have an advantage in the real world with its potent mid range and additional torque. Even in terms of handling, both bikes are likely to have different behaviour. The Guerrilla has fatter tyres compared to the Scrambler which means the Triumph will have better agility and flickability at slower speeds but conversely, the Royal Enfield will be more planted on the side of the tyre. Both bikes are priced similarly and look quite sleek, so choosing between the two will boil down to what your preference is after a detailed test ride.

Triumph Scrambler 400 X
Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450

Posted on: 7 Feb 2026