Autocar India
13h

Hi team, I have a Hyundai EON (Era Plus) model which I bought in March 2012. As I am nearing the 15-year mark, I wanted to know whether I should continue with it for another 5 years by paying the environmental tax or should I consider upgrading to a new car. My total running is not very high, around 25k kms and it generally gets driven only during the weekends, as my office commute is through an office cab. In the last 2-3 years, I have developed a habit of occasional long drives else its mostly city driving. The vehicle has a BS III engine and 819 cc. I changed all four wheels of my car in 2024. Overall, the condition of the car is good, and I haven't faced any major issues so far; more importantly, I am happy with the car. But I need an opinion on: 1) Whether I can continue using it for another 5 years by paying environment tax? 2) Given the scenario of making E20 mandatory, my car won't support E20 fuel as of now; are there any chances/ scope there will be normal petrol will still be available to support older model cars? 3) Any other factors that I need to consider/ think of before making a decision? Thanks for the help in advance

Verified
26m

You are happy with the car; it is mechanically sound, and your running is low. In this scenario, the most sensible decision is to keep the Eon for another five years. Paying the environment tax is a one-time cost, and as long as the car is well maintained, there is no reason to replace it purely because of age. The Eon is a simple, reliable car and for weekend city use with occasional long drives, it is likely to continue to do the job well.The only factors to consider are the car's condition and your own needs. If the car is rust-free, mechanically healthy, and you are happy with it, there is no financial logic in replacing it. If you start doing more long-distance driving and want better comfort, safety and performance, then an upgrade makes sense. Otherwise, keep the Eon and enjoy the low running costs.

1d

I currently own a Hyundai Venue 1.2 petrol. I am considering for an upgrade and my requirements include a 7-seater petrol or diesel automatic SUV under 25 lakh (on-road) with 80:20 city to highway ratio with maximum 15,000 km annually. Can I consider electric as well. What would be your recommendation? I am considering XUV 7X0, Safari or the Alcazar but I'm open to other options as well. Thanks in advance.

Verified
3h

Given your requirements, the Mahindra XUV 7XO diesel automatic would be our recommendation. With an 80:20 city-to-highway ratio and 15,000 km a year, diesel still makes sense because the XUV 7XO's diesel engine is refined, efficient and well suited to both city driving and long highway runs. The 7XO also offers a usable third row, strong performance and a well-equipped cabin, making it a proper upgrade from your Venue.The Tata Safari is a strong alternative if you prioritise ride comfort and a more spacious third row, but the XUV 7XO offers a better overall ownership experience and a more modern feature set. The Hyundai Alcazar petrol automatic is the more refined and easier-to-drive option in the city, but its third row is tighter and it does not feel like as big a step up from the Venue.On the electric front, the Mahindra XEV 9S is worth considering if you have home charging and predictable daily usage, but at Rs. 25 lakh on-road you are likely to be looking at the lower variants, and the XUV 7XO diesel still makes more sense given your usage pattern.Overall, the XUV 7XO diesel automatic strikes the best balance between space, performance, efficiency and long-term ownership.

VehicleMahindra XUV 7XO
VehicleTata Safari
VehicleMahindra XEV 9S
VehicleHyundai Alcazar
VehicleHyundai Venue
Mahindra XUV 7XO
Mahindra XUV 7XO
1d

I am planning to buy a 7-seater SUV and am considering the Mahindra Scorpio-N Z8L. However, I’m confused about which variant and powertrain would be best for me among petrol or diesel, and manual or automatic. My monthly running is around 400-500 km. I’m concerned that if I choose the petrol version, I might face a mileage issue. On the other hand, if I choose the diesel version, I’m worried that the low running could lead to DPF-related issues. Most of my driving is on highways, with around 300 km per month on highways and the remaining 100-200 km in the city. Could you please suggest which option would be more suitable for my usage? I would also appreciate if you could provide a comparison of the maintenance costs, fuel efficiency, and long-term ownership costs of the petrol and diesel versions, as well as manual vs. automatic.

Verified
4h

Go for the Mahindra Scorpio N Z8L diesel automatic. Your usage is predominantly on the highway, and the diesel engine is the better fit for this. The Scorpio N diesel is a strong performer on the highway, with good torque and effortless cruising ability, and the automatic gearbox makes long drives far more comfortable and stress-free. Your monthly running is low, but because most of it is highway driving, the diesel engine will regularly meet the conditions needed to keep the DPF system healthy, so DPF-related issues are unlikely to be a concern.The petrol engine is smooth and refined, but it is a large, heavy SUV and fuel efficiency will be noticeably lower than the diesel. In terms of maintenance costs, the diesel will be slightly higher over the long term, but the difference is not significant enough to outweigh the benefits of better fuel efficiency and stronger highway performance. Between manual and automatic, the automatic is the clear choice for a car like the Scorpio N. It is a big, heavy SUV and the automatic gearbox makes it much easier to drive both in the city and on the highway.Overall, the diesel automatic is the best fit for your usage and will give you the most satisfying ownership experience.

VehicleMahindra Scorpio N
20h

I own a Skoda Slavia Sportline that I had purchased in December 2025. After reading about so many BaaS offers on electric vehicles viz XEV 9S, where the registration charges are zero in Maharashtra, it is tempting to exchange my current car for an electric car. Should I do that? My monthly running is around 1000 km. Also, is BaaS available for the Sierra EV?

Verified
5h

With a monthly running of around 1,000 km, an EV can make sense, but only if you have a predictable usage pattern and access to home charging. The bigger question is whether it makes sense to exchange your Slavia, which is a relatively new and well-rounded car. The Slavia offers a great driving experience, good comfort and is a proven product. The XEV 9S is a very different proposition – it is a large, premium electric SUV with a very different ownership and usage profile.The BaaS (Battery as a Service) scheme on the XEV 9S is attractive because it reduces the upfront cost, but it also means you are paying a monthly subscription for the battery, which only makes sense if you are committed to long-term EV ownership and your usage pattern justifies it. The Sierra EV does not currently offer a BaaS scheme.Our advice would be to hold on to the Slavia for now. It is still a very capable car and you are unlikely to recover its value in a trade-in so soon after purchase. If you are keen on an EV, wait for a few more years until your Slavia has served its purpose and the EV market has matured further. If you are set on an EV today, the XEV 9S with BaaS is a good option.

VehicleMahindra XEV 9S
VehicleSkoda Slavia
VehicleTata Sierra EV
Mahindra XEV 9S
Mahindra XEV 9S
10h

I went to book a Hyundai Creta but seeing the stylish Verna next to Creta, took its test drive. The seat and ambience seem way better than any car and have almost decided to go with Verna but I have one doubt about its ground clearance. Since I will be driving the car in Chennai city and on highways with occasional patchy roads, even if scrapping occurs rarely, will it be a costly affair to repair?

Verified
7h

Go for the Hyundai Verna. Your usage in the city and highways with only occasional patchy roads is exactly the kind of scenario where the Verna works well. It offers a more premium cabin, a lower seating position and a more engaging driving experience than the Creta, which is why it felt so good on the test drive. The ground clearance is lower than the Creta, but it is not a deal-breaker. On rare occasions, you may scrape the underbody on a badly designed speed breaker or a deep pothole, but this is usually limited to minor scrapes on the underbody cladding or the exhaust heat shield. These are not expensive to repair and do not affect the car's reliability or safety. The Verna is a well-engineered sedan and can handle occasional rough patches without issue. If you are still concerned, you can take speed breakers at an angle and slow down on bad patches, which will minimise the chances of scraping. Overall, the Verna will give you a enjoyable ownership experience, and the ground clearance is not a reason to avoid it.

VehicleHyundai Verna
VehicleHyundai Creta
9h

I currently own a petrol Maruti Suzuki Ertiga purchased in 2021, that has covered around 85,000 km. It currently gives me around 7-8 kpl in city driving, so increasing fuel costs have made me consider switching to a CNG car. I also no longer require the Ertiga's third-row seats, as my son and daughter are now in college, so a five-seater would be sufficient for my needs. I am interested in the CNG and AMT combination, as I am 48 years old and believe an automatic transmission would make frequent city driving and traffic much less tiring. Currently, I am considering Tata Punch Adventure S CNG AMT, Tata Altroz Creative S CNG AMT, Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi CNG, Maruti Suzuki Brezza VXi CNG and Maruti Suzuki Baleno Zeta CNG. The Punch Adventure S CNG AMT is currently my preferred choice because it seems to offer a good balance of features, practicality and running costs. At its price, I also get more features, a CNG + AMT combination and what appears to be a very strong safety package. I was also considering the Brezza ZXi and VXi CNG, particularly for their larger size and Maruti's reputation for reliability. However, the lack of a proper spare wheel concerns me, as I have experienced tyre punctures several times. My budget is a maximum of Rs. 14 lakh. I am also unsure whether an electric car under Rs. 14 lakh would be suitable for me, as I would prefer to avoid range anxiety at this point. Based on your road tests and experience, which of these cars would you recommend? Is the Punch Adventure S CNG AMT the best choice for my requirements, or should I seriously consider one of the other options? Also, is there another car I may have overlooked?

Verified
7h

Based on your requirements, the Tata Punch Adventure S CNG AMT is a very sensible choice. It offers the CNG + AMT combination you are looking for, a strong safety package and a higher seating position that makes city driving less tiring. The Punch is also well priced for what it offers and is a genuinely practical five-seater.That said, the Maruti Suzuki Brezza ZXi CNG is still worth serious consideration. It is a larger car with a more powerful engine, better rear seat space and a more comfortable ride over broken roads. Maruti's service network and long-term reliability track record are also strong advantages. The lack of a proper spare wheel is a drawback, but it is not a deal-breaker if you are comfortable carrying a puncture repair kit and using roadside assistance.The Tata Altroz Creative S CNG AMT is also a good option if you prefer a more premium hatchback experience, but it does not offer the same ground clearance or seating position as the Punch.On the electric car question, you are right to be cautious. Most EVs under Rs. 14 lakh have relatively modest real-world range, and unless you have a predictable daily commute and home charging, range anxiety can be a genuine concern.Overall, the Punch Adventure S CNG AMT is the best fit for your requirements. It offers the right balance of fuel efficiency, ease of driving, safety and practicality for your current needs. The Brezza ZXi CNG is the better choice if you prioritise space, power and long-term ownership confidence. Both are strong options, so the final decision comes down to whether you value the Punch's CNG + AMT combination and higher seating position more than the Brezza's size and Maruti ownership experience.

20h

Hi everyone, I have a budget around 13 lakh and my annual running is around 8,000 km. I'm confused between buying a sedan or compact SUV like Kia Seltos etc. as I have sold my Tata Punch last month that I owned almost for 4.5 years but now I want to purchase good and elegant looking car that can last for 7 to 9 year without any hassle. Me and my wife have shortlisted cars like New Honda City SV variant, New Skoda Slavia Base one, or Upcoming Virtus in sedan segment. In suv segment, I have shortlisted cars like Seltos, Grand Vitara, etc. My wife wants to shortlist sedan. Please suggest me which one should I go for as it's the matter of investing my hard earned money. Also, which car will have good resale value in future.

Verified
8h

Go for the Honda City SV petrol manual. With your annual running of 8,000km, petrol is the right choice, and the City is one of the most reliable and hassle-free cars you can buy. It is also a car that is known to last well beyond 7-9 years with proper maintenance, which fits your ownership plan. The SV variant gives you the essentials within your budget, and the City’s strong resale value and Honda's wide service network make it a sensible long-term investment.The Skoda Slavia and Volkswagen Virtus are both excellent to drive, but the City is the safer long-term bet. Skoda and Volkswagen have improved their ownership experience, but Honda still has the edge when it comes to reliability and peace of mind over a long ownership period. On the SUV side, the Seltos and Grand Vitara are both good cars, but at your budget you will be looking at base variants, and neither will have as much resale as the City.Since your wife prefers a sedan and you are looking for a car that will last without hassle, the Honda City SV is the best option.

VehicleHonda City
VehicleSkoda Slavia
VehicleVolkswagen Virtus
VehicleKia Seltos
VehicleMaruti Suzuki Grand Vitara
Honda City
Honda City
1d

I am new to driving and am looking for a sub-4-metre petrol SUV with a torque converter automatic gearbox. My budget is under Rs 10 lakh ex-showroom. I have shortlisted two options: Skoda Kylaq Classic+ automatic at Rs 9.25 lakh and Mahindra XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic at Rs 9.99 lakh. We are a family of five. My current usage is mostly in the city, but in the future it could become a 50:50 mix of city and highway driving. The Kylaq does not get an infotainment system, although the dealer is offering one for around Rs 30,000. Its rear seat is also narrower than the XUV 3XO's. The XUV 3XO does not get cruise control, LED lights or driver-seat adjustment. Both cars offer similar fuel efficiency. Which one would be the better choice for me?

Verified
9h

Go for the XUV 3XO MX2 Pro automatic. As a new driver with a family of five, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is the more practical and comfortable choice. It has a wider rear seat, which makes a big difference for three passengers, and the cabin feels more spacious overall. The 1.2 turbo petrol engine paired with the 6-speed torque converter automatic is smooth and easy to drive, and the car feels stable and confident on the highway.The Skoda Kylaq is a good driver's car, but the narrower rear seat and the need to add an aftermarket infotainment system make it less appealing for family use. The missing features on the 3XO, like cruise control and LED lights, are not deal-breakers at this price point. Overall, the Mahindra car offers a better balance of space, comfort and value for a family of five.

VehicleMahindra XUV 3XO
VehicleSkoda Kylaq