Last Updated on: 15 Jul 2026
Mahindra Thar LXT 2.2 Diesel AT 4x4
The Mahindra Thar LXT 2.2 Diesel AT 4x4 variant is priced at ₹18.00 lakh. The LXT 2.2 Diesel AT 4x4 variant offers key features like . Explore complete specifications, and features below.
Mahindra Thar LXT 2.2 Diesel AT 4x4 Key Features
- Dead Pedal
Mahindra Thar LXT 2.2 Diesel AT 4x4 specifications
Engine & Transmission
Fuel Type/ Propulsion | Diesel |
Number of Cylinders | 4 |
Engine Installation | Front |
Engine Displacement | 2184 cc |
Engine Type | Turbocharged |
Max Engine Power | 132 hp at 3750 rpm |
Max Engine Torque | 300 Nm at 1600 - 2800 rpm |
Drive Layout | Four Wheel Drive |
Gearbox Type | Torque Converter |
Number of Gears | 6 |
Lockable Differential/s | Yes |
Fuel & Performance
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 litres |
Fuel Supply System | Common Rail |
Terrain Modes | Yes |
Auto Start/Stop | No |
Emission Standard | Bharat Stage VI |
0-100kph | 13.36 s |
20-80kph (in third gear/ kickdown) | 10.28 s |
40-100kph (in fourth gear/ kickdown) | 13.69 s |
Suspension & Steering
Front Brakes | Disc |
Rear Brakes | Drum |
Type of Power Assist | Hydraulic |
4 Wheel Steer | No |
Steering Adjust | Tilt |
Steering Adjust type | Manual |
Turning Radius | 5.9 m |
Front Suspension Type | Independent, Double Wishbone |
Front Springs | Coil Springs |
Rear Suspension Type | Independent, Multi-link |
Rear Springs | Coil Springs |
Damper Control | No |
Ride Height Adjust | No |
Wheels | Alloys |
Wheel Size | 18 inches |
Front Tyre Size | 255/65 R18 |
Rear Tyre Size | 255/65 R18 |
Spare Wheel | Full Size |
Dimensions
Length | 3985 mm |
Width | 1820 mm |
Chassis Type | Ladder Frame |
Height | 1844 mm |
Wheelbase | 2450 mm |
Doors | 3 |
Ground Clearance | 226 mm |
Mahindra Thar LXT 2.2 Diesel AT 4x4 features
Comfort
| Power Windows | Front |
| Cooled Storage | |
| Rear Parcel Tray | |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | |
| Bottle Holder in Doors | |
| Powered Tailgate |
Safety
| Crash Test Rating | 4 |
| Blind Spot Collision Avoidance Assist | |
| Rear Cross Traffic Collision Avoidance | |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Road Departure Mitigation System | |
| Auto emergency braking (AEB) |
Exterior
| Body Coloured Bumpers | |
| Connected LED | |
| Puddle Lamps | |
| Projector Headlamps | |
| ORVM turn indicators | |
| Outside rear view mirror (ORVM) |
Interior
| Speedometer | Analog |
| Tachometer | Analog |
| Trip Meter | |
| Average Fuel Consumption | |
| Average Speed | |
| Distance to Empty |
Entertainment
| Audio System | |
| CD Player | |
| Speakers | 4 |
| Branded Music System | |
| Front USB port | Type C |
| USB Input |
Connected Car Features
| Navigation On Instrument Cluster | |
| In Car Payment | |
| Remote AC On / Off via App | |
| Remote Car Lock/Unlock via App | |
| Remote Engine Start/Stop | |
| Find and Book Parking Slot |
Mahindra Thar variants
Mahindra Thar comparison


Questions you may find useful
Hi team, I am considering buying the Maruti Suzuki Jimny because of its compact dimensions, good looks, and SUV feel, mainly for city driving and short road trips. However, I am concerned about its low sales and resale value. The Mahindra Thar Roxx seems too large for city use, while the Mahindra Thar feels cramped in the second row. Please suggest whether I should consider buying the Jimny. Is a facelift expected soon? Should I wait for the 4x2 variant if it is going to be launched?
The Jimny is a genuinely likeable car with its compact dimensions, rugged looks and proper SUV feel, and it is well suited to city use and small road trips. However, your concerns about low sales and resale value are valid. The Jimny has not found a large audience, and that does have an impact on long-term ownership confidence. The Thar Roxx is indeed much larger and less city-friendly, while the standard Thar remains cramped in the second row, so neither is an ideal alternative for your usage.As for a facelift, there is no confirmed timeline for a major update, and waiting for a 4x2 variant is not advisable unless you are specifically looking for a more affordable, less capable version. The Jimny’s appeal lies in its 4x4 capability, and a 4x2 version would dilute much of what makes it special.If you love the Jimny for what it is, you can still go ahead and buy it, but do so with the understanding that resale value may not be its strongest suit. If that is a major concern, you may want to consider more mainstream alternatives like the Brezza or the Kylaq, which offer better ownership confidence without the same level of off-road character.
I want to buy both Mahindra Thar 3-door and a Kia Seltos. I am considering the base variants of both vehicles. The Thar will be used mainly for leisure, while the Seltos will be used primarily for city driving. In that case, would the petrol variant of the Seltos be a good choice? Also, I am looking at the base variant of the Thar, which is priced at around Rs. 9.99 lakh ex-showroom. Would this combination make sense for my requirements?
Yes, that combination actually makes a lot of sense if the roles are clearly defined. For the Seltos, the 1.5 naturally aspirated petrol is perfectly adequate if it is going to be your city car. It is smooth, refined, easy to drive in traffic and ownership costs are reasonable. You do not really need the turbo petrol if the car's primary duty is urban commuting. The NA petrol may not feel particularly exciting, but for city use it will feel relaxed and effortless. Even in its lower variants, the Seltos is surprisingly well equipped, so it does not feel bare bones.As for the Thar 3-door, if it is purely a weekend fun vehicle, the base model can make sense from a value perspective. However, it is worth remembering that the Rs. 9.99 lakh ex-showroom variant is a 4x2 model, so you do not get the full off-road capability that most people associate with the Thar. If your idea of enjoyment is primarily the lifestyle, road presence and occasional beach or trail drives, it will still do the job. However, if you genuinely want to explore tougher trails and off-road terrain, it is worth stretching to a 4x4 variant.
I want to visit Spiti Valley during winter, when there is likely to be light to moderate snowfall. Which vehicle would be a better choice for this trip: the Mahindra Thar or the Maruti Suzuki Jimny?
Pick the Maruti Suzuki Jimny. For Spiti’s narrow, broken mountain roads with light to moderate snow, the Jimny’s small size and low weight make life easier. It is simpler to place on those cliff-edge tracks, its narrow tyres bite better on packed snow, and visibility is excellent. The 4x4 with low range works cleanly, and Maruti’s service reach in Himachal is wider if you do need help.Be ready for one compromise. The 1.5 petrol loses power at high altitude, so climbs will be slow and you will use lower gears more often. Cabin and boot are smaller too.If you regularly travel with four adults plus big luggage, or you expect fresh, deeper snow, the Thar’s extra torque and higher clearance give you more headroom. But for a typical winter, Spiti run in light to moderate snow where control and confidence matter more than brute force, the Jimny is the better tool.
I currently own a Toyota Fortuner, two Mahindra Thar Roxx models, and an XUV700. I also previously owned a Scorpio N. I am now planning to sell one of my Thar Roxx vehicles, as it is an early production model and has been giving me several issues. My usage involves daily driving in rough terrain and mountainous conditions, so having a capable 4x4 is essential for me. Before the Roxx, I owned a 3-door Thar, and honestly, given my current usage, the 3-door version seems to suit my needs better. I am now confused about what to buy next. Should I go back to a 3-door Thar, continue with the Roxx, or consider another capable 4x4 option better suited for rough and mountain use?
Since you've already owned a Mahindra Thar 3-door, and you believe that it is the best for you, we would recommend you go ahead with it. You already know what the vehicle is capable of, and as an owner, you're aware of all its pros and cons too. There are no other options in the market that can deliver what the Thar can.The Maruti Jimny is smaller, very tough, and surprisingly capable, although its engine performance is no match for the Mahindra. The Force Gurkha is capable off-road, but lacks the Thar's sophistication, and feels too crude in comparison. Other monocoque AWD options include the Toyota Hyryder, Maruti Grand Vitara, and Victoris, Mahindra XUV 7XO, and dual-motor EV options like the Vinfast VF7 and Tata Harrier EV. Do note that while all these models will get you through sticky situations and handle mild trails easily, none are as good off-road as the Thar. All things considered, go for the Thar; it seems to be the best fit for you.
I would like to understand the highway driving comfort of the Mahindra Thar 2-door diesel base model. I typically undertake long-distance drives of around 700–750 km, twice a month.
The Mahindra Thar 2-door certainly has a lot of appeal, and it’s easy to see why you’re considering it. It offers strong road presence and that rugged, go-anywhere feel that few SUVs can match. However, when it comes to highway comfort, especially for long drives of 700-750km, it’s not the most suitable choice. The hydraulic steering is quite heavy, the ride is quite stiff and tends to feel bumpy, particularly over uneven surfaces, and there’s noticeable road noise at cruising speeds. All of this adds up, making long highway journeys more fatiguing than they should be.A better-rounded alternative is the Thar Roxx. It retains much of the Thar’s visual appeal and toughness but is significantly more comfortable and refined. The lighter electric steering, improved ride quality, and better overall highway manners make it far easier to live with on long trips.That said, it still uses a body-on-frame setup, so it does feel bumpy on broken roads and may move passengers around, but it’s a far less of a compromise than the 2-door Thar.
Mahindra Thar price in India
Upcoming Cars





Mahindra Cars



Trending Cars

Latest Cars




