India not a profitable market, but a very strategic one: Stellantis APAC head

    Its JV with Tata helped it earn a net profit of Rs 759 crore.

    Published On Mar 12, 2024 02:45:00 PM

    34,925 Views

    Citroen Jeep sales India
    Listen to this Article

    Stellantis currently operates three brands in India – Jeep, Citroen and Maserati – and while their individual domestic sales remain marginal, the auto conglomerate still considers India as a market of strategic importance. Speaking to the automotive media in Delhi, Ashwani Muppasani, chief operating officer, Stellantis India and Asia Pacific said, “India is not a profitable market for me, but it’s a very strategically important market because we design, manufacture, export and source from here.”

    Indeed, while Stellantis’ domestic market share could be described as modest at best, its operations here have become profitable on the back of exports and sourcing of components, chief of which is a few lakh units of engines and gearboxes exported from India. Furthermore, the brand's JV with Tata Motors reported a 20.48 percent surge in net profit, amounting to Rs 759 crore in FY2023, and driven by the assembly of the hot selling Tata Nexon that it produces at its JV plant in Pune. 

    Stellantis currently has a plant in Hosur that exclusively manufactures powertrains for domestic and export purposes, and two auto manufacturing plants – the Ranjangaon (Pune) plant that produces Jeep and Tata models, and the Thiruvallur (Chennai) plant that produces Citroens. In addition, the company also has local software and R&D centres in Bangalore, Hyderabad and Tamil Nadu.

    This, Muppasani says, gives its Indian operations strategic importance as it enables Stellantis to be globally competitive. “Europe and the US are expensive because of inflation and logistics, so India gives us that strategic edge,” said Muppasani.

    Domestic sales also need to be addressed

    The company, however, is keen to improve its domestic sales; last year on average Jeep sold 545 cars per month while Citroen bagged about 780 units a month on average. Muppasani says that this will improve and the brand is committed to the Indian market. “It’s a patience game in India; we are committed to this market and you will see faster action from us and we will address our issues which we know we have.”

    Broadly speaking, the brand has struggled with pricing its Jeep models and has grossly under-equipped its locally made Citroens. Muppasani says the company has begun work on addressing both issues, and to that end said that the Citroen C3 cars would have, "hygiene issues addressed" sharing examples of an auto AC system – currently manual – that would be introduced in July and a foldable key that would come sooner.

    Also See:

    Citroen C3 Aircross automatic review: Gets the basics right

    Citroen India appoints Shishir Mishra as its new brand director

    Jeep Cars

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img
    img
    Krishna MV - 47 days ago

    The compact SUV market is fairly matured in India and there are several brands in the fray. Minimum equipment requirements are also defined by the existing models. Despite knowing all this Citroen launches a totally under equipped car and now says sales are low.....really Citroen ?? People are also willing to pay for the added equipment but for sure want the bells and whistles.

    img
    Venkatesan Ramakrishnan - 47 days ago

    Citroen is a good looking car. But very badly equipped. let them learn from Koreans on how to hit the first ball to sixer.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.27%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.39%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.70%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.64%

    Total Votes : 1633
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe