Jaguar C-X17 SUV prototype review, test drive

    Jaguar's C-X17 SUV is still a few years away from production, but our brief first drive of the radical concept shows huge promise.

    Published on Nov 07, 2013 06:07:00 PM

    24,053 Views

    Oddly, the steering feels pretty good. We briefly wonder why, then remember Graham Wilkins has confirmed this car's use of double wishbone front suspension (deemed better for precision than MacPherson struts) because it allows the low bonnet line the designers seek, and the superior steering and ride the engineers know a compact Jaguar needs. 
     
    Now it's time to pull up and let the next bloke have his go. I doubt we have hit 65kph, and there is more chuntering from the brakes as we pull up. The ghostly rear-riding engineer again does his stuff with the Tommy-bar and all forward motion ceases. We alight, and because we're in a Jaguar with a feet-out driving position, I almost fall out of the car, forgetting that its H-point is a good 10cm higher than anything else the company makes. Continued..
     
     
    You can’t. Not yet, anyway. This short drive in an early prototype has been anything but a sustained drive, or even respectable progress, yet we have learned two important things from it. 
    Sitting in the driver's seat, enjoying its sight-lines and the view over the bonnet, I am left with absolutely no doubt that this crossover is on the way to becoming a distinguished production Jaguar. 
     
     

    Jaguar Cars

    Copyright (c) Autocar UK. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Search By Car Price
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.28%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.42%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.67%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.64%

    Total Votes : 1527
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe