2016 Renault Kwid 1.0 Review, Test Drive

    The popular Kwid gets a new engine. But does it improve the way the budget hatchback drives?

    Published on Aug 19, 2016 01:00:00 PM

    89,793 Views

    What’s it like to drive?

    Renault wanted the Kwid 0.8 to be the most fuel-efficient car in its class and that target meant a few compromises had to be made in terms of drivability and performance. However, maximum fuel economy wasn’t the sole priority number for the Kwid 1.0. Buyers opting for the larger engine version would want more from the driving experience and that’s what Renault has sought to provide with the new motor. The three-cylinder, 1.0-litre engine is new for Renault and finds its first application in the Kwid. Peak power is 68hp at 5,500rpm and max torque is 91Nm at 4,250rpm. For reference, the Kwid 0.8 makes 54hp and 72Nm. The Kwid 1.0 weighs about 700kg (or 40kg more than its smaller-hearted sibling), which is light even by bantamweight class standards. As a result, the Kwid has the best power-to-weight ratio of 97hp per tonne.

    You can tell how the large engine has enhanced the Kwid from the moment you fire it up. There are fewer vibrations and less of that low rev uneasiness. Power delivery is still not perfectly fluid in first gear, but things settle down as you build speed. There is noticeably more power, so overtaking traffic in town is that bit easier and, in general, the Kwid feels more sorted. Performance is good enough but the Alto K10 feels zestier. What helps the Kwid in town is the progressiveness of the clutch and that the five-speed gearbox (shared with the 0.8) is light to use. Those looking for the convenience of an automatic will have to wait until the end of the year, which is when the AMT version will be launched.

    Thanks to the improved performance, there’s a new-found feeling of confidence out on the highway too. The Kwid 1.0 cruises well enough and you don’t have to work the engine too hard to make your way past trucks either. Noise levels do get high if you stretch the engine but in general it’s not bad. However, at steady speeds, you’ll notice a mechanical whine in the background that you just have to make peace with.   

    Elsewhere, Renault hasn’t altered the Kwid 1.0 so it drives just like the standard car. There is maturity in the way it rides over bumps and even feels quite planted for what is a really light car. The steering is nice and light but it feels lifeless and lacks self centering.

    Should I buy one?

    If the 0.8-litre engine was the only thing holding you back from buying the Renault Kwid, the 1.0 is the car for you. The larger engine has improved the way the Kwid drives and has addressed its biggest weakness. Performance is good for city use and acceptable for long out-of-town drives as well. What’s more, the 1.0 promises much by way of fuel economy too. The ARAI-tested fuel economy figure for the Kwid 1.0 is 23.01kpl which is not too far down on the 0.8’s 25.17kpl.

    Add the new dimension of performance to all that we like about the Kwid and what you end up with is a rather wholesome budget package. The Kwid 1.0 is priced at Rs 3.82 lakh (ex-showroom, Delhi) or about Rs 22,000 more than the standard Kwid RXT,  (Rs 3.95 lakh for the RXT (O)) which seems pretty reasonable for the upgrade you get. In all, this is the version of the Kwid to buy and quite simply the best budget hatchback around.

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Search By Car Price
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.22%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.08%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.92%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.79%

    Total Votes : 1484
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe