New baby Jaguar saloon detailed

    All-new front-drive small saloon to rival A3, new CLC. Likely production base in India and the UK, expected launch by 2015.

    Published On Nov 08, 2011 03:10:00 PM

    2,653 Views

    New baby Jaguar saloon detailed

    Jaguar engineers are working on an all-new front-drive baby saloon that will spearhead sales in India and China, as well become one of the company’s leading new models in the all-important US market. It should be launched by 2015 and is likely to be built in India and the UK.

    According to sources in India, the new model is thought to be about 4.5 metres long and will be powered by Jaguar Land Rover’s all-new three-cylinder, 1.5-litre engine and four-cylinder, 1.8 and 2.0-litre turbocharged petrol and diesels. Sophisticated new-generation eight- and nine-speed automatic gearboxes are also thought to be on the menu. The baby Jaguar, however, won’t be a budget model.

    There will be a number of variations on the mainstay four-door, including a coupé and possibly a small roadster. The company had also created a hatchback concept called the RD-6 back in 2003.

    Despite the reputation of the unloved X-Type, Jaguar’s decision to build a range of front-drive cars is being partly forced on the company by the stringent new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations due in the US from 2016.

    Jaguar will be in good company downsizing into a range of frugal baby saloons. Audi has already shown its 4.4m-long A3 saloon concept and Mercedes its A-class-style F800 concept. Both are based on new front-drive platforms and aimed primarily at India, China and the US.

    Last year, now-departed JLR boss Carl-Peter Forster said Jaguar needed a “successor to the X-type… and we need [it] in several variations.” However, it has become clear in recent months that this model will not be a direct rear-drive rival for the BMW 3-series, but a more modern interpretation of a compact, eco-friendly, executive car.

    There’s no indication of the new car’s styling direction, but it’s thought it won’t build on the avant-garde look of the latest XJ. Aerodynamic efficiency will be a necessity, though, as will a premium look to justify the price. The interior will be more modern than anything Jaguar has done so far, putting the emphasis on large-screen displays and connectivity, as well as Audi-matching finish.

    The baby Jaguar could be based on a variation of the new LR-MS platform that underpins the new Range Rover Evoque. Even though Jaguar is increasingly making play of its use of lightweight aluminium construction, an all-aluminium platform would be too expensive for a car of this price.

    However, last year, Mark White, Jaguar’s chief technical specialist for body engineering, said that if he designed a ‘mixed-materials’ structure for a potential small model, he would use steel box sections and aluminium sheets for the floorpans, roof panels and doors to “achieve maximum weight saving for minimum cost.”

    Jaguar engineers are said to have particularly ambitious fuel economy targets for the new model. Last year Ron Lee, Jaguar’s chief powertrain engineer, revealed that the company was aiming to build an XF-sized car that could emit just 100g/km CO2 by 2020.

    Much of this work — including a 1.8-litre, four-cylinder petrol motor with a very high power density of as much as 170bhp per litre and a diesel engine good for 133bhp per litre — will also be applied to the baby saloon.

    Copyright (c) Autocar UK. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.16%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.05%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.95%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.85%

    Total Votes : 1476
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe