Global NCAP crash tests to get a lot tougher

    Under its #SaferCarsForIndia campaign, GNCAP will introduce additional crash and safety testing by end 2021. It will also include active safety evaluation.

    Published On Dec 01, 2020 02:00:00 PM

    1,05,162 Views

    Tata Altroz GNCAP

    Global NCAP is all set to make its safety testing protocol for India far more stringent. Its #SaferCarsForIndia programme – launched in 2014 – currently awards cars up to a 5-star rating for adult and child occupant protection, via a single crash test only.

    • GNCAP to include side impact test on all cars
    • New testing protocols to also consider active safety measures.
    • 2020 Mahindra Thar is the latest Indian car to undergo GNCAP tests.

    Called the Offset-Deformable Barrier test, it consists of the car driven at 64kph and with a 40 percent overlap into a deformable barrier, which GNCAP says is the equivalent of a crash between two cars of the same weight, both moving at 50kph. Additional tests are also carried out, like the side impact test recently done on the Mahindra Thar, though these are only for 5-star rated cars or done at the behest of the manufacturer. 

    In contrast, the European NCAP is a well-rounded protocol and consists of a plethora of tests that cover crash avoidance (active) and crash safety (passive), as well as post-crash safety like ease of passenger extraction. These tests were introduced in Europe and other countries in a graded manner and speaking to Alejandro Furas, secretary general of Global NCAP, we understand that the Indian protocol is on a similar path with an enhancement due next year.  “We were expecting a new protocol by January of 2020, but thanks to COVID-19 we’ve pushed this out to January 2022. We took this decision in May this year and manufacturers know we are going in this direction” said Furas.

    Furas also noted that our new safety norms – set to UN standards – are pretty good and a far cry from what it was prior. “In some ways, you are way better than the US. You have pedestrian protection on the roadmap and even ABS for motorcycles, something that does not exist over there, so you are pretty good”.

    Closing the Gap

    However, there is a gap to the European standards and Global NCAP expects to close in on this at a faster pace, with Furas saying “In the years since, the industry has improved a lot, so we can put a little bit more pressure in the new protocol”.

    Furas also stated that elements of the new protocol are as yet being finalised. “We have considered many things, not just ESC (expected). Something that will definitely come is the side impact system,” Furas said. Currently, the side impact test is carried out for only 5-star rated cars, or if a manufacturer voluntarily submits for it. With the change in protocol, all cars will be subjected to the test. Importantly, he also added that active safety elements like Electronic Stability Control, as well as seat belt reminders, will also figure in the new protocol and are set to be prerequisites for a car achieving a 5-star rating. This is good, because it will force manufacturers, especially those with a 5-star rating, to also look at putting in place active safety measures.

    Also see:

    Breaking down the Global NCAP crash test

    Maruti Suzuki S Presso scores 0 stars in Global NCAP crash tests

    Hyundai Grand i10 Nios secures two stars in Global NCAP crash tests

    Kia Seltos secures three stars in Global NCAP crash tests

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.16%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.66%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.70%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.47%

    Total Votes : 1589
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe