All-new Rolls-Royce Phantom in the works

    New Phantom could use new chassis, have a plug-in hybrid version.

    Published On May 18, 2014 05:30:00 PM

    5,179 Views

    All-new Rolls-Royce Phantom in the works

    Rolls Royce Phantom Series II.

    Luxury carmaker Rolls-Royce has started work on the all-new Phantom. While the new model is unlikely to see daylight before another three years, design chief Giles Taylor’s team has “already started sketching” to develop the first ideas for the new model, according to reports.
    The architecture of the new Phantom is undecided at this stage. The current car uses a unique aluminium spaceframe structure, but bosses at Rolls-Royce's parent company BMW are also said to be considering a radical shift to build the new Phantom around a BMW i3-style combination of a carbonfibre bodyshell mounted on a separate aluminium chassis.
    As for the powertrain, the Phantom’s V12 is likely to remain the mainstay engine of the range, but a plug-in hybrid version is a certainty for the second-generation car. 
     
    Despite strong suggestions that Audi and Porsche will build pure-electric versions of their luxury models – influenced by the success of the Tesla Model S – BMW is said to be undecided on an electric Phantom. The 2011 battery-powered 102EX Phantom concept remained a one-off after an indifferent reception from existing Phantom owners.
     
    Taylor had hinted at the Geneva motor show that the new Phantom would move on visually from today’s model. He said: “I don’t feel boxed in by the [existing] design. We are treading an evolutionary path and have a defining vision of modernity. The Wraith was all about modernising the brand. The fastback profile has a contemporary relevance. We are working on how to lay down what we call a ‘charismatic expressiveness’ for our future design language.”
     
    Discussing his team’s thinking on the new Phantom, Taylor strongly suggested that it will be less formal looking. 
     
    “I don’t think that the current Phantom is ‘stiff’. I’m a fan of the permanence of the Phantom. But if we are going to take the model forward, we need to retain the Rolls-Royce ‘golden section’, a big part of which is the angle of the rear pillar. You get a lot of privacy behind that wide C-pillar. It’s part of the Phantom recipe.”
     
    Taylor also hinted that the new Phantom’s grille, lights and air intakes would be different from those of the current model, saying that there needed to be a “sense of connection and integration of the [car’s] graphics”.
     
    A decision on whether to build the new flagship around an aluminium chassis and carbonfibre structure is said to be in the balance. Demand for the similarly constructed i3 is strong and the i8 sports car is also about to come on stream, and increasing demand on BMW’s carbonfibre facilities to supply as many as 1000 extra bodies annually might be too much of a stretch.
    However, this technology would reduce the Phantom’s weight, improving economy, and put the BMW flagship model at the technological cutting edge. It is also ideal for pillarless construction, and a separate chassis would resonate with original, historic Rolls-Royce models. It could make building a wider range of Phantom models more cost-effective, too.
     
    With the next-generation BMW 7-series likely to have carbonfibre in its make-up, as will the next Audi Q7, the new Phantom needs to be seen to keep up with these much cheaper luxury models.
     

    Copyright (c) Autocar UK. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.19%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.11%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.87%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.83%

    Total Votes : 1473
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe