Union Budget 2016-17: Auto industry says additional taxes deterrent to growth

    SIAM says proposed move to result in vehicles getting dearer amid already weak consumer demand.

    Published On Feb 29, 2016 08:14:00 PM

    5,998 Views

    Union Budget 2016-17: Auto industry says additional taxes deterrent to growth

    The auto industry today expressed concern over Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s proposal to levy further taxes on cars with the apex auto body, Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), saying the move would hurt the industry.

    “We believe the government’s decision to levy additional taxes would result in the rise of prices across categories of passenger vehicles and would hurt the industry. With the government’s focus being rationalisation and simplification of taxes, introduction of new taxes on vehicles will only dampen the spirit of the auto sector,” Vinod Dasari, president, Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) said.

    In a move to reduce air pollution and reduce vehicular traffic, the government on Monday announced additional taxes such as 1 percent infrastructure cess on small petrol, LPG, CNG cars with engine capacity not exceeding 1,200cc, 2.5 percent on diesel cars with engine capacity of less than 1,500cc and 4 percent on vehicles and SUVs longer than four metres and with engine capacity higher than 1.5 litres. An additional 1 percent tax is also to be levied on the purchase of cars exceeding value of Rs 10 lakh.

    Roland Folger, managing director & CEO, Mercedes-Benz India, said tax on luxury cars will be a deterrent for the growth of the industry. “In the short to mid-term, we missed an opportunity to drive growth in the sector, which could have further benefitted the long-term prospects of the auto industry,” he said.

    “We expected some reforms in the duty structure, which could have infused growth in the sector and would have provided additional employment. The rationalisation of the duty structure would have also created a level playing field for all brands,” Folger said, adding that significant spending on infrastructure and rural development, however, was laudable.

    The government failed to address the automobile industry’s demand for a reduction in excise duty, which further left most automakers disappointed.

    “The budget lacks a roadmap for the automotive sector, which has for long continued to be an engine of India's economic growth. The high level of discounting in the domestic market today indicates weak consumer demand,” Nigel Harris, president and managing director, Ford India said, adding that the additional taxes are likely to impinge on sales and industry growth prospects.

    Other industry members also expressed disappointment over lack of further measures to promote alternative fuel technology. "We would have expected some measures to promote alternate fuel technologies which would have helped the environment as well. We would encourage the government not to just think based on size of the vehicle which has no relation to the technology," according to Shekar Viswanathan, vice chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor.

    More on the Union Budget 2016-17

    Union Budget 2016-17: Cars and SUVs to get more expensive

    Union Budget 2016-17: Higher taxes hit car prices

    Union Budget 2016-17: Auto industry reactions

    No additional funds for EV industry in Budget 2016

    Budget 2015-16 focuses on improving infrastructure

    New car price hike to hit consumers, industry

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    15.27%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.78%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.69%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.25%

    Total Votes : 2004
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe