Come together

    Avik talks about how the auto industry should have, collectively, played a bigger role in contributing to the relief work during the second wave of the pandemic.

    Published on May 21, 2021 07:00:00 AM

    8,489 Views

    Come together

    OEMs have responded in individual capacities but an industry-wide effort is needed.

    As we go through one more phase of the pandemic peak, all across the country, the automobile industry must be pondering on how to balance the immediate needs with the mid-term plans. With many diverting manufacturing capacities to supplying oxygen and allocating funds to making beds available and importing critical interventions, it is a matter of time before sales does take a knock. Though there will be no centralised ‘lockdown’, states will take their own measures and most importantly, consumer sentiment has taken a bigger beating than in 2020.

    This wave has hit middle-class India. And it has hit it hard, as almost each of us knows of a near and dear one who is adversely affected. This vehicle-buying segment is no longer cocooned from the vagaries like last year when the migrant, marginal and contract workers were most hit. The middle-class actually believed that the virus was ‘defeated’ and all was getting back to ‘normal’. This panic for vaccines, medicines, beds, oxygen, and basic care was never ever imagined. The entire medical and administrative infrastructure, or lack of it, has been exposed. This trauma will take months to come out of, of having gone through the stress and loss, much more than being asked to work from home and take a pay cut.

    The industry leaders who are saying that all that is being produced is being sold are putting up a desperate brave face and spinning a ‘positive’ narrative. They should have rallied together much earlier in combining resources to set up facilities and import critical care components. If the industry can come together to find solutions for its own problems like shipping containers and chips, why does it always have to wait for a prod from the government to take action on bigger issues of national criticality?

    The automobile industry should have been proactive in announcing measures and taking action, as a composite, and not as individual firms, early March itself when the indications of another wave were amply clear. But then, the year-end targets took precedence to maintain the narrative of the ‘economic recovery’.

    Leadership carries the burden of responsibility. Of walking the talk when things matter most about ‘building the nation, responsibly!’ The responsibility is self-calibrated and imposed and demands action before demanded. Being a member of the industry for decades, it does irk me that there has been no unilateral action plan announced where all automakers leave aside making and selling for building and protecting.

    In a few months, when the curve flattens once again, they will be discussing the whens and hows of the Auto Expo 2022. It is a sure showcase of the industry’s prowess with vehicles, technology and solutions. Right now, in the current case of demonstrating collective and co-creative leadership, it is more like ‘auto exposed’!

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.19%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.08%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.93%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.81%

    Total Votes : 1487
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe