Latest questions answered by experts
DEEPAK JOSEPH
•1dHi, I am 67 years old and have knee and back issues. I have been driving a Ford EcoSport automatic for a long time and am now looking to upgrade. I am considering a used MG Hector Savvy Pro CVT or a Hyundai Creta IVT, with a budget of ₹15-16 lakh. Please suggest which option would be better for me, or recommend any other suitable cars.

Autocar India
Between the two, the Hyundai Creta IVT is the better choice, largely due to Hyundai’s wide service network and reputation for hassle-free ownership. You will appreciate its light steering and the IVT’s gentle creep function. The 1.5-litre engine is refined, and the IVT makes good use of the available performance. Ride quality is comfortable, and it is easy to step in and out of, which is important for you. Hyundai’s wide service network also means shorter trips for routine care and faster parts availability, keeping ownership simpler. Opt for the latest model, which was launched in 2024.Also, ideally, buy from sources like Hyundai’s own certified used car platform or trusted outlets like Spinny, which can offer you a warranty.During the test drive, do three park-reverse cycles and a tight U-turn; check thigh support, lumbar comfort, and that brake-to-accelerator transitions feel effortless. Also, ask the dealer about any remaining warranty, along with the terms and conditions of the used-car warranty.

Ragul
•2dI am looking for a good city-commuter bike similar to the Yamaha FZ. I would appreciate expert recommendations to help me choose the best available options.

Autocar India
Since you have mentioned you're looking at the Yamaha FZ, we'll give you the best recommendations in this segment. If you want something with performance, features and sharp styling that doesn't sacrifice comfort or fuel efficiency, then our top picks in the segment would be the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V and Bajaj Pulsar N160. Both are offered in multiple variants with different permutations and combinations of features and tech, so pick the one you like best.If you want a simple, straightforward commuter, then pick between the Honda Unicorn and SP160, depending on which one you prefer the look of. A test ride of these should help you narrow down which bike is right for you.
Ahaan Asthana
•1dHi, I am planning to buy a new SUV and would appreciate your advice. My annual running is around 8,000-9,000 km, with approximately 90% of it on highways. I am considering petrol manual options and am confused between the Tata Harrier petrol manual and the Mahindra XUV7XO petrol manual. Which one would be a better choice for my usage, and why?

Autocar India
The Mahindra XUV 7XO petrol manual will make a great highway companion for your needs. With 8,000-9,000 km a year, petrol is the right call; diesel usually starts to make sense above about 15,000 km/year. The XUV 7XO’s 202hp turbo feels effortless for quick 80-120kph overtakes, which is helpful on open highways. Its long wheelbase keeps it planted at speed, and the wide, supportive seats are great for long stints. The ride and handling balance, with the new suspension setup it received with the facelift, is phenomenal too.If you find that the third row is not spacious enough, then look at the Tata Safari petrol instead.On the test drive, take it on the highway and check stability, ride comfort and overtaking performance.
Nayan Makwana
•22hHi, I am confused between the Royal Enfield Meteor and the Royal Enfield Himalayan. Which bike is better for usage consisting of 60% city riding and 40% highway riding?

Autocar India
Since your usage skews more towards slower city riding than faster highway trips, going with a Royal Enfield 350 would be our recommendation. However, the Meteor isn't at the top of that list. We've found the Hunter / Classic / Bullet to be more comfortable primarily because of their more upright and neutral riding triangles. With its laidback cruiser ergonomics and low seat, which puts more weight on your tailbone, the Meteor will feel a little stiffer than its aforementioned siblings over bad patches of road. The Himalayan will also make for a decent city machine and will be inherently more capable on the highway, but its large size and taller seat height might be deal breakers for you. If this is going to be your only bike to do everything, purely from a capability standpoint, the Himalayan makes more sense.Take a test ride of both to understand the pros and cons of each and see which one suits your use case better before you make a decision.
Awaljeet Singh
•3dI want to buy a bike with more than 46 bhp, and my budget is between ₹5-6 lakh. Could you please suggest some suitable options?

Autocar India
To get a motorcycle making more than 46hp within your budget, you can consider any of the Royal Enfield 650cc models, as well as the Aprilia RS and Tuono 457 models. Royal Enfield's 650s aren't sporty machines and are also considerably heavy, with some of them weighing 240kg or more. The Aprilia 457 models are properly thrilling and entertaining machines to ride, but have been plagued by some troubling engine reliability issues. It would be advisable to speak to some RS and Tuono 457 owners to see what their experience has been before pulling the trigger on either of the two. Lastly, the Kawasaki Ninja 500 is another option that fits the bill, and truthfully, it is a great bike to ride, but its steep pricing is a tough pill to swallow.Do your research, take multiple test rides and speak to people who own these bikes before you make your choice.
Saswat Das
•4dI am planning to upgrade to a new vehicle and am confused between the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 MT and the Renault Duster 1.3 MT. Which one should I choose?

Autocar India
Without knowing any further requirements, or your budget, it's hard to make a definitive recommendation. However, all things considered, the Renault Duster 1.3 turbo petrol MT is the better overall package than the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI MT. For one, just the power alone is considerably higher in the Duster 1.3, and in fact, it's more than even the Kushaq's larger 1.5 TSI has on offer. Thereafter, the two SUVs are closely matched - both have excellent handling, both offer good space and comfort in the front seat, though it's only average in the rear seat, and both are now well equipped. However, the Duster edges ahead in two areas - the first being boot space, which is a massive 518 litres, compared to about 385 in the Skoda. And the other is ride comfort - while the Kushaq is good, the Duster is even better, delivering a ride that is comfortable, stable and solid feeling, all at once. Thus, overall, the Duster 1.3 Turbo is the better choice.
Need expert advice?
Ask the Autocar community and experts.
