2015 Maruti Baleno long term review, third report

    Who needs diesel when you have a ridiculously frugal petrol engine in a super-light car?

    Published on Oct 17, 2016 07:02:00 AM

    40,139 Views

    Model : Baleno

    Look, I’m not a particularly fuel-efficient driver, and I’m the first to raise my hand and admit it. I’ve tried, once or twice, I promise, and sure, I could probably make it happen if I really had to. But in everyday driving, it’s just not my style. It’s too much effort; too much tedium. My very, very patient colleague Rahul Kakar once brought a Renault Lodgy from Delhi to Mumbai using just about half a tank of diesel. I’d have probably given up by Gurgaon.

    What doesn’t help is my commute, which is like Kryptonite that feeds on driving enjoyment, which, in turn, is every petrolhead’s super-strength. It’s 80 percent traffic, some of which is of the crawling, 5kph variety, so it’s something I try to get over with as soon as possible. Subsequently, on our fuel efficiency record cards, there’s always a pretty dismal number next to my name, because if I’m not stuck in traffic, I’m making the most of not being stuck in traffic, if you know what I mean.

    The thing is, a routine has started forming on my commute, and I’ve accepted my fate. I adopt a Zen-like state of mind and embrace the traffic; flow with it, if you will. And that, as it turns out, makes for much better fuel efficiency. I tanked up the Baleno recently and was astonished to see it had done 542km between fill-ups! That’s an astonishing 15kpl! I whipped out a calculator in disbelief and a few frenzied taps later, realised it was right. I then spent half an hour interrogating the entire Autocar India editorial and testing team to see if anyone accidentally filled it without me knowing, and didn’t log a record. Nope.

    What I did find out is that it did go on one leisurely highway run between those fill-ups, and that will have definitely driven the number up by a kpl or two. But the truth is, it nudges past 12kpl on my commute every day. And this is a petrol car, lest we forget. Two things make this possible. The
    first is the weight, which at 890kg even for this top-spec car, is a full 75kg lower than the cheaper Swift. The second is the engine – this is quite possibly the best all-rounder in the naturally aspirated 1.2-litre class. It’s so tractable low down, it can handle your 5kph crawl in second gear without a fuss.

    And keeping me entertained during the crawl is the superb colour-screen between the dials
    that gives you so much information. At first I thought it was gaudy and gimmicky, but I’ve soon realised that trying to bump up the ‘real-time fuel-economy’ number is an immensely fun game – it’s also the reason I’ve been subconsciously working on improving my fuel efficiency. The only annoyance is that the ‘distance to empty’ readout disappears once the yellow reserve fuel warning light comes on – that’s when you need it the most!

    I’ll stop here, simply because it’s the longest I’ve talked about fuel efficiency in a single stretch of my entire life (what have I become?). For the kind of driving I’m resigned to daily, however, this newfound light-footedness of mine is a great gift, especially after the recent petrol price hike. And so is the Baleno; it’s comfortable, spacious, feature packed, and now fuel-efficient in my hands too.

    Fact FilePetrol
    Price when newRs 8.46 lakh (on-road, Mumbai)
    Test economy12.07kpl (overall)
    Maintenance costsNone
    FaultsRattle from rear left wheel
    Distance covered9340km

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Search By Car Price
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.72%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.42%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.95%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.91%

    Total Votes : 1064
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe