Updated 2017 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V launched

    Minor updates make the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V BS-IV compliant; comes equipped with AHO feature.

    Published On Mar 19, 2017 01:00:00 PM

    1,08,727 Views

    Updated 2017 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V launched

    With BS-IV norms kicking in soon, manufacturers are releasing updated versions of their motorcycles to be in compliance with them. TVS today released the Apache RTR 200 4V with updates that comply with the norms. BS IV-compliant fuel will be available at pumps across the country from April 1, 2017.

    The updates on the new TVS are restricted to engine tweaks and do not involve any cosmetic changes. The 2017 Apache RTR 200 4V also gets the AHO (Automatic Headlight On) feature, which is part of the BS-IV checklist. The headlight switch will now be missing from the handlebar switchgear.

    The updated Apache RTR 200 4V has been launched at a price of Rs 97,800 (ex-showroom, Mumbai). For Rs 1,06,000 (ex-showroom), you get the stickier Pirelli Sport Demon tyres instead of the standard TVS Remora rubber.

    TVS has made no mention yet of when we can expect the top-spec ABS-equipped, fuel-injected model to hit showrooms. As of now, it is only the carburetted version that is on sale. With competition building from the likes of the re-introduced, updated Bajaj NS200 and newly-launched Yamaha FZ25, it is crucial for TVS to launch the top-spec variant of the Apache RTR 200 4V to stay competitive.

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Bike Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.86%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.55%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.61%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.98%

    Total Votes : 1017
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe