Uber plans flying taxis by 2020

    Aims at daily long-distance commuting in heavily congested urban areas; tags it as a cheaper and safer transportation option than cars.

    Published On Apr 30, 2017 12:00:00 PM

    4,868 Views

    Uber plans flying taxis by 2020

    Uber will launch flying taxis in Texas and Dubai by 2020, the company's chief product officer Jeff Holden has announced at the Uber Elevate Summit.

    Using small electric VTOL (Vertical Take-off and Landing) aircraft, Uber will charge passengers $1.32 per mile.

    This price is slightly higher than the cost of booking an UberX cab. The firm says that the cost will reduce over time so much so that'll it'll one day be cheaper to use Uber's flying taxi service than to run a car.

    Uber described its plans as enabling “rapid reliable transport between suburbs and cities, and ultimately, within cities”. Daily long-distance commutes in heavily congested urban areas not served by existing infrastructure would likely to be the first to use the aircraft.

    More than a dozen companies are working on the project, including vehicle charging station maker Chargepoint, which will develop an exclusive charger for the network of Uber aircraft.

    Twice as safe as a car

    Uber's electric aircraft, which would be quieter, cheaper and less polluting than its nearest equivalent, the helicopter, and would ultimately use autonomous technology, the company says, making it much safer by “significantly reducing operator error”.

    Uber envisages VTOL aircraft to be twice as safe as driving a car due to autonomy and distributed electric propulsion (DEP). The use of DEP allows for fixed-wing VTOLs, which wouldn't need large helicopter rotors and generate lift with greater efficiency than rotors.
    However, Uber has said: “No vehicle manufacturer to date has yet demonstrated a commercially viable aircraft featuring DEP, so there is real risk here.”

    Cheaper than running a car

    Uber believes that, in the long term, using VTOL aircraft taxis can be more affordable than running a car. Acknowledging that today’s aircraft and helicopters cost about 20 times more than a car, due to low-volume manufacturing, it said: “If VTOLs can serve the on-demand urban transit case well — quiet, fast, clean, efficient, and safe — there is a path to high-production volume manufacturing (at least thousands of a specific model type built per year) which will enable VTOLs to achieve a dramatically lower per-vehicle cost. The economics of manufacturing VTOLs will become more akin to automobiles than aircraft.”

    It added that early VTOL vehicles are likely to be very expensive, but because the ridesharing model quickly reduces vehicle cost, “the high cost should not end up being prohibitive to getting started”.

    “Once the ridesharing service commences, a positive feedback loop should ensure that it ultimately reduces costs and thus prices for all users, i.e. as the total number of users increase, the utilisation of the aircraft increases,” the company said.

    Uber also identified a number of challenges which must be addressed to make the aircraft viable. These include the certification process for new aircraft concepts, battery technology for electric transport and issues with air traffic control.

    The greatest operational barrier for deploying a fleet of flying taxis is a lack of sufficient locations for landing pads, Uber says.

    The firm describes the vision as “ambitious” but believes “it is achievable in the coming decade if all the key actors in the VTOL ecosystem — regulators, vehicle designers, communities, cities, and network operators — collaborate effectively".

    Copyright (c) Autocar UK. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.81%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.52%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.70%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    24.98%

    Total Votes : 1021
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe