Crash course in making an electric car safe in a collision

    Jesse Crosse talks about the safety measures put in place to make electric cars as safe as their fossil-fuelled counterparts.

    Published on Aug 02, 2020 08:00:00 AM

    7,485 Views

    Crash course in making an electric car safe in a collision

    EVs have different structures and safety technology to provide protection in a collision.

    How safe is an electric car in a crash, and what are manufacturers doing to make them safe? These questions crop up a lot and are usually triggered by lurid videos of an EV being consumed in a battery-fuelled inferno, but that doesn’t make them any more dangerous than their fossil-fuelled equivalents when things go wrong.

    To minimise damage to the high-voltage battery in an impact, manufacturers are rethinking their approach to vehicle architecture. Fully encased, floor-mounted batteries provide a protective environment but deflecting the energy of an impact away from the battery is also important.

    Polestar has developed the ‘SPOC Block’ (severe partial offset crash) for its 2 EV. This consists of two aluminium blocks set in either side of the front bulkhead. The blocks prevent the front wheels from being driven backwards into the battery compartment during a partially offset frontal collision. The EV also has a new front lower load path (FLLP – how the structure diverts the forces from an impact) to further protect the battery and occupants from frontal impacts, including one of the worst: from a pole.

    Design can help push back the threshold of fatal injury to a car’s structure but eventually the laws of physics have their way. All cars rely on one fundamental thing to do their job and that’s energy – and lots of it. MPGe (miles per gallon gasoline equivalent) puts the energy contained in a single gallon of petrol at around 40kWh, equivalent to the battery capacity of many smaller EVs. Whether a car is powered by a battery, petrol or diesel, the energy it stores is likely to be released in a major crash.

    EV batteries are a little more tricky than conventional fuels because a fire inside one is due to thermal runaway, when the heat produced causes damage that results in more heat being released. It’s difficult to extinguish because the battery is made up of several thousand individual cells and there will be sections of the battery that are still active and still contain energy. If the damaged battery is disturbed, thermal runaway can resume until the battery is totally kaput.

    The other major difference between conventional and all-electric cars is high voltage. EVs operate at around 400V, and while the Porsche Taycan is the first EV with an 800V system, it won’t be the last. For a car’s occupants or emergency services personnel, damaged high-voltage cabling could be lethal, so, in a crash, the battery is disconnected at source. This isn’t a new idea: it has been a regulation in motorsport for decades to prevent electrical sparks igniting fuel in a crash and all race and rally cars must be fitted with either manual or electronic battery disconnect systems.

    The usual method for disconnecting an EV battery is the firing of explosive ‘pyrofuses’, which sever the high-voltage cables close to it. Bosch revealed a new device last year that’s triggered by a silicon chip responding to the airbag system; it drives a small, sharp wedge through the cable.

    A Side Helping Of Safety

    A side impact can be one of the most dangerous types of crashes and – apart from energy-absorbing door, sill and B-pillar structures – the interior trim and side, curtain and seat-mounted airbags are used to protect occupants. The Polestar 2 also has front seat side airbags to protect individual occupants’ limbs on both sides.

    Comments
    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now
    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    13.57%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.78%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    28.50%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    25.16%

    Total Votes : 958
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe