First Ride

Suzuki Swish review, test drive

The Swish 125 is a sharper, more upmarket-looking alternative to the popular Access.

DETAILS
  • Make  Suzuki
  • Model  Swish
  • Edition  2012
4
photos
Single-pod dial is easy on the eyes. Telescopic front forks give a comfy ride. Ignition key slot has a safety shutter.

The Swish 125 is the marginally taller and lighter sibling to Suzuki’s acclaimed Access scooter. The company has done a good job on the design of this smart looking scooter, giving it a flair that was missing on the Access. The rounded mudguard and front apron are endowed with smooth lines, while the clear-lens, flush-fit front indicators are neatly set into the front apron. Above those is the modern looking headlamp which is bigger than the one on the Access. The rear-view mirrors look neat, while the instrument panel consisting of an analogue speedometer, fuel gauge and icons for the high-beam and indicators, is well laid out. The palm grips feel good; the switches are crisp and decent to operate, but the brake levers feel flimsy. Just like on the Access, Suzuki has provided a centralised ignition key slot with a safety shutter, and it is also where you open the under-seat compartment from. The Swish lacks a glove box though, and the solitary bag hook is placed inconveniently low and close to the floorboard.

The wide seat is comfortable for both rider and passenger. The sleek side panels carry forward the posh look with new-age graphics and backward-flowing creases. The body panels are made of a composite material called ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) which is used on the Access too. The Swish gets a wide aluminum grab bar and sharply styled brake light cluster which looks upmarket and sporty.

The Swish 125 is powered by the smooth, 124cc, single-cylinder, four-stroke engine that also powers the Suzuki Access. It produces 8.58bhp at 7000rpm and 1kgm of peak torque at 5500rpm, and comes with a push-button starter as well as a kick lever. The gearless scooter pulls smoothly from low in its powerband and is quick enough for city use.

As is expected from good automatic scooters, the Swish 125 does a great job of providing twist-and-go convenience. Like the Access, this scooter too is equipped with telescopic front forks and a single hydraulic shock absorber at the rear. The suspension offers a comfortable ride even on road undulations. The Swish’s handlebar unpleasantly collides with the rider’s knees when taking sharp turns, and this can be unsafe. Braking is via 120mm drums which do an effective job and the Swish rides on tube-equipped tyres and steel rims.

The scooter comes with a spacious, 20-litre under-seat compartment. However, you have to pay Rs 658 more for the optional pillion foot pegs, which are standard on an Access, and around Rs 800 more to add a glove box in the front. The bike retails at Rs 46,257 (ex-showroom, Delhi) and is available in a choice of five colours - blue, white, black, red and grey. The Swish 125 is an upmarket gearless scooter which should be popular amongst college-goers. However, underneath it all, Suzuki has simply made cosmetic changes to the Access to arrive at the Swish 125; their basic dimensions and specification are the same. Suzuki is a manufacturer that is capable of producing superior products and we would have expected better than this.

 

Fact File

Price Range (in lakhs)*

Ex-showroom price Rs 46,257 (ex-showroom, Delhi)

Engine

Fuel Petrol
Type Single cylinder, air-cooled, four-stroke
Power 8.58bhp at 7000rpm
Torque 1kgm at 5500rpm
Power to weight 78bhp per tonne

Transmission

Gearbox CVT

Dimensions

Length 1780mm
Width 650mm
Height 1140mm
Wheel base 1250mm
Ground clearance 160mm

Chassis & Body

Weight 110kg
Wheels 10-inch steel
Tyres f-r) 90 /100 – 10 inches

Suspension

Front telescopic forks
Rear monoshock, stressed engine

Brakes

Front 120mm drum
Rear 120mm drum

Economy

Tank size 6 litres
See more about:  swish, review, road, test, first, drive, activa, dio, access

Suzuki Swish review, test drive

notSet

Single-pod dial is easy on the eyes. Telescopic front forks give a comfy ride. Ignition key slot has a safety shutter.
Two highly anticipated cars and a whole lot more in the June 2013 issue
What's in this issue?

Most Read
Find a car review
Latest Car Reviews
New 2014 Bentley Flying Spur review, test drive

New 2014 Bentley Flying Spur review, test drive

1 day 3 hours ago
The new Bentley Flying Spur comes with a raft of updates to make it even ...
Mahindra e2o review, test drive and video

Mahindra e2o review, test drive and video

6 days ago
We comprehensively road test Mahindra's all-electric e2o
2013 Audi R8 V10 review, test drive

2013 Audi R8 V10 review, test drive

May 13, 2013
The R8 V10's track capabilities are well known, but just how well does the ...
Mahindra Thar (Fourth report)

Mahindra Thar (Fourth report)

May 7, 2013
Loads of upgrades to the Thar this time. A few issues as well.
Tata Nano LX 2012 (Third Report)

Tata Nano LX 2012 (Third Report)

May 7, 2013
For a car that costs as little as it does, the Nano has put up with ...
Latest News
Government approves quadricycles
Green signal for quadricycles but restricted to commercial use.
3 hours ago   3 pictures
SCOOP! New Bajaj Pulsar 375 flagship revealed
Biggest, fastest and most important Pulsar 375 ever breaks cover.
3 hours ago   4 pictures
Chevrolet to hike prices across line-up
Rising transportation costs and diesel prices make Chevrolet hike prices of ...
23 hours ago   1 picture
New Toyota Corolla to be unveiled on June 6
Next-gen Toyota Corolla to come with updated 1.8-litre petrol and 1.4-litre ...
1 day 3 hours ago   1 picture
New name for next Land Rover Freelander
Next Land Rover Freelander will join the extended-Discovery family.
1 day 23 hours ago   2 pictures
Autocar Magazine

Issue: 166 | June 2013

Two highly anticipated cars and a whole lot more in the June 2013 issue
Autocar Magazine
Latest Poll
What's the worst bit of bad driving according to you?



or View results
Cutting lanes
  43%
 
Driving between two lanes
  23%
 
Driving slowly in the fast lane.
  35%
TOTAL VOTES: 1668

Vote now
View previous Polls »