Bajaj RE60 spy pics

    Bajaj soldiers on with the testing of the RE60 quadricycle. It will be powered by a 200cc DTS-I engine good for 20bhp.

    Published On May 14, 2013 05:34:00 PM

    3,402 Views

    Bajaj’s first foray into the four-wheeler market is currently steeped in controversy, but testing is going on nonetheless.

    The company has clearly stated that the RE60 quadricycle is Bajaj’s effort to replace the autorickshaw. Caught testing near Aurangabad by Kedar Bindu, the RE60 was designed assuming the company would be able to push through less stringent rules for the quadricycle. Bajaj is of the opinion that vehicles in this class should not have to conform to the same safety norms as normal cars. The argument is that if Tata could manage to certify the Nano and meet the norms, there should be no roll back.

    However, Bajaj claims the goal here is to promote safety and efficiency. It says the RE60 is safer than your everyday autorickshaw, and that it even emits lesser CO2.

    The RE60 is constructed on a lightweight, metal-polymer monocoque, which keeps the vehicle’s kerb weight at just under 400kg. Power will come from a 200cc single-cylinder liquid-cooled rear mounted four-stroke DTS-i engine, which is good for approximately 20bhp.

    The RE60 will come with a 2+2 or 1+3 seating layout option, a 44-litre boot and a top speed of 70kph. Its 2.75m length, 1.3m width and 3.5m turning circle radius should make it very good for manoeuvring in city traffic.

    But, is Bajaj testing a safer version of the RE60?

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    The Mahindra XUV 300 facelift will be called the XUV 3XO. Should more brands rename models for facelifts?

    Yes, it could give new life to a slow-selling car

     

    14.16%

    Yes, but only if there are significant changes

     

    32.10%

    No, it's confusing and dilutes the brand name

     

    29.94%

    No difference, the product speaks for itself

     

    23.80%

    Total Votes : 1483
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe